Engine Pre-Ignition Control via Dynamic Air-Fuel Ratio

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Engines with high compression ratios or boosted to increase specific output are prone to low-speed pre-ignition combustion events, leading to high in-cylinder pressures and combustion knock, which existing mitigation strategies like immediate in-cylinder rich or lean fuel injections can address but may degrade catalyst efficiency and exhaust emissions.

Innovation Solution

An engine controller adjusts the air-to-fuel ratio dynamically, enriching the cylinder initially to mitigate pre-ignition and then transitioning to a leaner ratio to maintain stoichiometric conditions, compensating for excess fuel and oxygen levels to prevent catalyst degradation, while also limiting engine load and advancing spark timing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If immediate in-cylinder rich fuel injection is carried out to mitigate pre-ignition, then pre-ignition combustion events are reduced, but catalyst efficiency and exhaust emission levels are degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepre-ignition mitigationVSAvoidcatalyst efficiency degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a periodic fuel injection strategy where rich fuel injection is applied for a limited number of combustion events (e.g., 1-5 events) following pre-ignition detection, then stopped. This periodic application provides sufficient cooling to mitigate pre-ignition while limiting the duration of rich operation to preserve catalyst efficiency, resolving the contradiction between immediate mitigation and long-term catalyst protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies fuel injection preemptively during the compression stroke upon detecting pre-ignition conditions. By injecting fuel early in the compression stroke rather than waiting for combustion, the system maximizes the cooling effect during the most critical phase while minimizing the total fuel quantity needed, thereby reducing catalyst degradation while maintaining effective pre-ignition mitigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If in-cylinder lean fuel injection is carried out to mitigate pre-ignition, then pre-ignition risk is reduced, but catalyst efficiency is degraded due to sudden change in air-to-fuel ratio

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepre-ignition mitigationVSAvoidcatalyst efficiency degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a periodic fuel injection strategy where rich fuel injection is applied for a limited number of combustion events (e.g., 1-5 events) following pre-ignition detection, then stopped. This periodic application provides sufficient cooling to mitigate pre-ignition while limiting the duration of rich operation to preserve catalyst efficiency, resolving the contradiction between immediate mitigation and long-term catalyst protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the air-to-fuel ratio parameter based on detected pre-ignition conditions. By transitioning from stoichiometric operation to a temporarily enriched mixture and then back, the system achieves the necessary charge cooling effect while minimizing the duration and magnitude of AFR deviation, thereby protecting catalyst efficiency while maintaining pre-ignition mitigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If engine load is limited to reduce pre-ignition occurrence, then abnormal combustion events are reduced, but engine power output is decreased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepre-ignition reductionVSAvoidengine power output
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies load limiting selectively to specific cylinders that have detected pre-ignition events rather than uniformly limiting load across all cylinders. This localized approach allows the engine to maintain high power output from unaffected cylinders while applying mitigation only where needed, resolving the contradiction between pre-ignition reduction and overall engine power maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies fuel injection preemptively during the compression stroke upon detecting pre-ignition conditions. By injecting fuel early in the compression stroke rather than waiting for combustion, the system maximizes the cooling effect during the most critical phase while minimizing the total fuel quantity needed, thereby reducing catalyst degradation while maintaining effective pre-ignition mitigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces pre-ignition events without degrading catalyst efficiency or exhaust emissions, maintaining average air-to-fuel ratios near stoichiometry and stabilizing engine operation.

Implementation Method 1

by enriching a cylinder in response to an occurrence of pre-ignition, a cylinder air charge cooling effect may be achieved that may reduce the occurrence of further abnormal combustion events

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporative cooling: Evaporative Cooler

Data Source

PatentUS8463533B2Method and system for pre-ignition control
Publication Date: 2013.06.11 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US8463533B2 patent drawing
  • US8463533B2 patent drawing
  • US8463533B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for mitigating engine pre-ignition based on a feed-forward likelihood of pre-ignition and feedback from a pre-ignition event. In response to an indication of pre-ignition, a cylinder may be enriched while an engine load is limited. The enrichment may be followed by an enleanment to restore exhaust catalyst feed-gas oxygen levels. The mitigating steps may be adjusted based on engine operating conditions, a pre-ignition count, as well as the nature of the pre-ignition.