Dynamic EV Battery Charging Control System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric vehicle battery charging systems are inefficient and detrimental to battery longevity due to constant charging rates that do not account for the battery's charge level, thermal state, or external factors, and they fail to optimize cabin temperature, leading to energy wastage and reduced comfort.

Innovation Solution

A control system that integrates feedback processes to manage battery charging and thermal conditioning, allowing for variable charging rates based on user inputs, external factors, and preset drive times, while also controlling cabin temperature to optimize battery life and power output, and reduce energy costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If constant charge rate is applied to the battery, then charging speed is maintained, but battery longevity and power efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging speedVSAvoidbattery longevity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The charging rate is dynamically adjusted based on real-time monitoring of battery charge level, temperature, and predicted drive time. The system transitions from a static constant charge rate to a dynamic variable charge rate that adapts to changing battery conditions, optimizing both charging speed and battery longevity simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback control mechanism that continuously monitors battery state (charge level, temperature) and uses this information to adjust the charging rate. The control system receives feedback from sensors and modifies charging parameters accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that resolves the contradiction between charging speed and battery health.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If battery is charged immediately upon plugging in, then charging time is reduced, but energy cost increases due to peak pricing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging timeVSAvoidenergy cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary monitoring of battery state and external factors (including utility pricing signals) when the vehicle is plugged in, but delays the actual charging action until optimal conditions are met. By anticipating lower-cost charging periods and preparing the battery thermally in advance, the system achieves cost-effective charging without excessive delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the timing parameter of charging based on external pricing signals and battery state. Instead of a fixed immediate charging schedule, the charging start time is adjusted as a variable parameter based on utility rate structures, allowing the system to exploit off-peak pricing while meeting user drive time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If battery temperature is not controlled, then system complexity is reduced, but battery efficiency and lifetime deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidbattery lifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The battery thermal management function is merged with the charging control system. The same control unit that manages charging rate also manages thermal conditioning, combining multiple functions into a single integrated system. This reduces overall system complexity while ensuring battery temperature is properly controlled for longevity and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Use of energy by moving object

If cabin temperature is not pre-conditioned, then energy consumption is reduced, but user comfort deteriorates upon vehicle entry

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoiduser comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary thermal conditioning of the cabin during off-peak charging periods or using waste thermal energy from battery conditioning. By preparing the cabin temperature in advance while the vehicle is plugged in and electricity rates are lower, the system reduces the energy burden on the primary propulsion battery and improves user comfort without significant additional energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2880739B1Method and system for battery charging and thermal management control in electrified vehicles
Publication Date: 2016.06.08 FCA US LLC
  • EP2880739B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2880739B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP2880739B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A method and a control system for charging a battery in a plug-in hybrid or all-electric vehicle, thermally conditioning the battery, and/or thermally conditioning the passenger compartment of the plug-in hybrid or all-electric vehicle.