EV Battery Charging Schedule Using ML for SoC and SoH Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing battery management systems in electric vehicles do not effectively optimize the state of health (SoH) of the battery by controlling charging patterns, leading to reduced battery lifespan and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based system that utilizes a regional model to generate weights for a local model, optimizing battery charging schedules by considering driver behavior, vehicle utilization, and regional data such as weather and traffic conditions, maintaining the battery state of charge (SoC) within a desired range to enhance SoH.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the battery is charged to 100% capacity, then the energy storage is maximized, but the battery lifespan is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy storage capacityVSAvoidbattery lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The charging system dynamically adjusts the target state of charge based on real-time battery conditions, vehicle usage patterns, and environmental factors. Instead of a fixed 100% charging target, the system adapts the charging level to optimize both energy storage and battery longevity, maintaining charge between 20-80% under normal conditions while allowing 100% charge only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the charging parameter (state of charge target) based on multiple factors including battery temperature, age, usage patterns, and climate conditions. By varying the target charge level dynamically rather than always charging to 100%, the system extends battery life while still meeting energy storage needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If fast charging is used, then the charging time is reduced, but the battery wear is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging timeVSAvoidbattery wear
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic charging cycles that alternate between fast charging and slower charging phases. During fast charging, the system monitors battery temperature and charge level closely, then inserts slower charging periods to allow thermal management and reduce stress on battery cells. This periodic alternation enables faster overall charging while mitigating battery wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Before initiating fast charging, the system performs preliminary assessments of battery conditions including temperature, state of charge, and recent usage patterns. If conditions are not optimal for fast charging, the system prepares the battery through preliminary conditioning (such as thermal management or slower initial charging) to create safe conditions for subsequent fast charging, thereby reducing wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Duration of action of stationary object

If the charging schedule is customized using machine learning, then the battery life is extended, but the system complexity is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery lifeVSAvoidcharging control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The charging system uses machine learning models that automatically learn and adapt to user charging patterns, vehicle usage, and environmental conditions without requiring manual programming or complex configuration. The system serves itself by autonomously optimizing charging schedules based on data it collects, reducing the need for complex external control mechanisms while extending battery life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where charging outcomes are monitored and fed back to the machine learning model. This feedback mechanism allows the system to automatically refine its charging strategies based on actual battery performance and user behavior, extending battery life through adaptive optimization without requiring complex manual intervention or system reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12606045B2Battery state of charge control using machine learning
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 RIVIAN HOLDINGS LLC
  • US12606045B2 patent drawing
  • US12606045B2 patent drawing
  • US12606045B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Controlling a battery state of charge using machine learning is provided. A system of an electric vehicle identifies data including a state of charge of a battery of the electric vehicle, a state of health of the battery of the electric vehicle, and a drive mode of the electric vehicle. The system establishes, based on input of the data into a local model configured on the electric vehicle and trained with machine learning, a schedule to control charging of the battery of the electric vehicle. The system executes, responsive to a power source electrically coupled to the battery of the electric vehicle, the schedule to control an amount of current supplied from the power source to the battery of the electric vehicle.