Electric Vehicle Battery Mounting Clash-Proof Block

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing battery mounting structures for electric vehicles face challenges in maintaining the battery box's position during crashes, leading to potential damage and increased weight and cost due to the need for larger fixing portions.

Innovation Solution

A structure comprising a body member, a battery case with a supporting member projected outward, and clash-proof blocks connecting the battery case to the body member, which includes lateral-end and front-end supporting members made of iron, and clash-proof blocks to prevent the battery case from moving during impacts, thereby maintaining the battery's position and reducing weight and cost.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the front fixing portions and rear fixing portions fix the battery box to the side frames by conventional means, then the battery box can be mounted, but the battery box moves forward during front end impact due to inertia

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery position stability during crashVSAvoidfixing portion strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The fixing system is divided into multiple independent fixing portions (front fixing portions and rear fixing portions) that are distributed along the battery box. During crash, these segmented fixing portions work together to restrain battery movement more effectively than a single large fixing structure, reducing the kinetic energy impact on any single point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extends the fixing structure in the longitudinal direction by adding rear fixing portions to the conventional front fixing portions. This dimensional extension creates a longer restraint baseline that more effectively counteracts the forward inertia of the battery during front end impact, improving position stability without requiring larger individual fixing portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the front and rear fixing portions are increased in size to prevent battery movement during crash, then the battery position stability improves, but the weight and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery position stability during crashVSAvoidfixing portion weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly increasing the size of all fixing portions, the invention applies fixing structures selectively at critical locations (front and rear ends of the battery box). This partial action approach provides sufficient crash resistance by restraining battery movement at the extremes, avoiding the weight penalty of oversized fixing portions throughout the entire battery structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention achieves improved crash resistance by extending the fixing structure along the longitudinal dimension (adding rear fixing portions) rather than increasing the cross-sectional size of individual fixing portions. This dimensional strategy provides better battery restraint during crash while maintaining lighter individual component sizes, thus reducing overall weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If the front and rear fixing portions are increased in size to prevent battery movement during crash, then the battery position stability improves, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery position stability during crashVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention implements fixing portions only at the critical front and rear locations of the battery box rather than uniformly throughout. This partial action approach provides sufficient crash resistance at lower manufacturing cost by concentrating fixing resources where they are most needed to prevent battery movement during impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention achieves improved crash resistance by extending the fixing structure along the longitudinal dimension (adding rear fixing portions) rather than increasing the cross-sectional size or complexity of individual fixing portions. This dimensional strategy provides better battery restraint while using simpler, more cost-effective fixing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS8276697B2Structure for mounting batteries to electric vehicles
Publication Date: 2012.10.02 MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORP
  • US8276697B2 patent drawing
  • US8276697B2 patent drawing
  • US8276697B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A structure for mounting a battery onto an electric vehicle comprises: a body member forming a body of the electric vehicle; a battery case containing a battery; a supporting member, which is projected outward from the battery case and is disposed under the body member, fixed to a bottom of said battery case; and a clash-proof block connecting between the battery case and the body member.