EV Powertrain Battery Cell Control Using Motor Phase

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Typical electric vehicle powertrains are complex and inefficient due to decoupling of energy storage components from motor controllers, leading to high voltage and current levels, increased costs, and reduced performance, with fixed battery packs limiting operating range and causing unnecessary losses.

Innovation Solution

A scalable and manageable energy storage system that includes a motor control unit and power bank management unit, allowing each cell to determine discrete power output based on motor phase, aggregating outputs to achieve optimal overall power output, reducing complexity and latency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a fixed battery pack is used in typical electric vehicle powertrains, then the system structure is simplified, but the operating range is limited and unnecessary losses occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidoperating range
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The battery pack is divided into multiple individual cells, each capable of independent operation and controlled by separate control circuits. This segmentation allows selective activation of cells based on power requirements, extending operating range while maintaining manageable system structure through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a fixed, static battery pack configuration to a dynamic architecture where individual cells can be selectively activated and deactivated based on real-time power demands. This dynamic control enables optimization of power delivery and extends effective operating range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If energy storage components are decoupled from motor controllers in typical powertrains, then system modularity is improved, but voltage and current levels increase leading to higher costs and reduced performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem modularityVSAvoidvoltage and current levels
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The control functions for energy storage components and motor control are merged into a unified system architecture. The motor controller integrates with battery cell control circuits, allowing coordinated management of power flow and reducing the need for high voltage/current isolation that typically increases system complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If individual cells determine discrete power output based on motor phase, then power output precision is improved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower output precisionVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single motor controller is designed to perform multiple functions: it controls motor operation and simultaneously manages individual battery cell output. This multi-functionality achieves precise power output control based on motor phase while avoiding the need for separate dedicated control circuits for each cell, thereby managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If a scalable energy storage system with individual cell control is implemented, then driving range and response speed are improved, but system complexity and manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidmanufacturing costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements selective control of individual cells or subsets of cells rather than requiring full control of all cells in all operating conditions. This partial action approach achieves fast response speed when needed while reducing control complexity and manufacturing costs during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240001801A1Powertrain for an electric vehicle featuring a scalable and manageable energy storage system
Publication Date: 2024.01.04 BLUE VOLTA TECH INC
  • US20240001801A1 patent drawing
  • US20240001801A1 patent drawing
  • US20240001801A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electric vehicle powertrain is disclosed. The powertrain includes an electric motor electrically coupled to an energy storage system That includes a motor control unit to determine a phase of the electric motor and a plurality of cells to determine a discrete power output based, at least in part, on the determined phase of the electric motor; and generate the determined discrete power output. The energy storage system includes a power bank management unit to determine an overall power output based, at least in part, on the determined phase of the electric motor; determine a subset of the plurality of cells based, at least in part, on the overall power output; and command each cell of the subset of the plurality of cells to generate the discrete power output, the subset of the plurality of cells to collectively generate an output equal to the overall power output.