Vehicle Battery Charger Timing Control for Peak Grid Demand

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing power infrastructure is inadequate to meet the demand for widespread use of electric vehicles, as charging them would put additional strain on already peak-loaded power systems, necessitating innovative solutions to manage energy distribution efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle charger system that includes a controller and display, allowing users to manually or programmatically control the charging process based on time of day, optimizing the charging rate, start, stop, or threshold levels to align with energy availability and reduce peak demand.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If electric vehicles are charged during peak hours to meet user needs, then user convenience is improved, but strain on the power grid increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidstrain on power grid
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The charging system performs preliminary actions by scheduling and executing battery charging during off-peak hours before the user needs the vehicle. The controller automatically manages charging timing, allowing the battery to be recharged overnight or during low-demand periods, thus avoiding peak-hour grid strain while ensuring the vehicle is ready for use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts charging rates and timing based on grid conditions and user needs. The controller can modify charging parameters in real-time, switching between standard and fast charging modes, and coordinating with utility companies to optimize when charging occurs based on current grid capacity and demand signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If charging rate is increased to reduce charging time, then productivity is improved, but energy consumption and grid demand increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging speedVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The charging system dynamically adjusts the charging rate based on real-time conditions including battery state of charge, grid availability, and user requirements. The controller can switch between different charging power levels, using high-power fast charging when time is critical and lower-power charging when time is abundant, thus optimizing the balance between charging speed and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as charging current, voltage, and power levels to optimize charging efficiency. By adjusting these parameters based on battery characteristics and grid conditions, the system achieves effective charging while managing energy consumption and avoiding excessive grid demand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If fast charging is implemented to meet user demand, then ease of operation is improved, but infrastructure requirements and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging convenienceVSAvoidinfrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The charging system provides self-service capabilities through automated controller management. The controller independently monitors battery status, communicates with utility companies, schedules charging operations, and adjusts charging parameters without requiring complex user intervention or sophisticated infrastructure. This automation simplifies the user interface while managing the complexity internally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary between the battery, power grid, and user interface. It manages all complex interactions including communication with utility companies, coordination of charging timing, and adjustment of charging parameters, thereby shielding users from infrastructure complexity while enabling convenient fast charging when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11909011B2Vehicular battery charger, charging system, and method displaying charge information
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 CHARGELOGIC LLC
  • US11909011B2 patent drawing
  • US11909011B2 patent drawing
  • US11909011B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle battery charger and a vehicle battery charging system are described and illustrated, and can include a controller enabling a user to enter a time of day at which the vehicle battery charger or system begins and/or ends charging of the vehicle battery. The vehicle battery charger can be separate from the vehicle, can be at least partially integrated into the vehicle, can include a transmitter and/or a receiver capable of communication with a controller that is remote from the vehicle and vehicle charger, and can be controlled by a user or another party (e.g., a power utility) to control battery charging based upon a time of day, cost of power, or other factors.