EV Charger Cyber Threat Detection and Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cyberattacks on electric vehicle charging stations, particularly those with higher power and automation, pose a significant risk to grid stability and security, as they can compromise IT infrastructure and lead to malfunctions, voltage instability, and safety hazards without physical attacks.

Innovation Solution

An electric vehicle charger equipped with circuitry that determines a cybersecurity threat level and performs responsive actions to protect the charging station, utilizing a collaborative anomaly detection system with host-based and network-based anomaly detection logic units and machine learning-based mitigation to identify and counter cyber threats.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If higher-power charging stations (>200 kW) are deployed to reduce charging time, then productivity is improved, but the system becomes more vulnerable to cyberattacks and grid instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging speedVSAvoidsystem security
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary anomaly detection and threat assessment before cyberattacks can compromise the charging station. The host-based and network-based anomaly detection logic units continuously monitor for suspicious activities, and the machine learning model evaluates threat levels in advance, enabling preventive actions to be taken before grid instability occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where anomaly detection units monitor system behavior, the machine learning model evaluates threat levels based on this data, and responsive actions are triggered automatically. This closed-loop feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt to emerging threats and maintain security while operating at high power levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If increased automation and integration with electric distribution utilities are implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but the extent of automation creates greater control vulnerabilities to coordinated attacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidcybersecurity threats
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The anomaly detection system and machine learning threat evaluation act as intermediary layers between the automated charging operations and the control systems. These intermediaries filter and analyze control signals and data exchanges, detecting malicious activities before they can affect the automated operations or utility integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The charging station performs self-monitoring and self-protection through automated anomaly detection and threat response mechanisms. The system autonomously evaluates security threats and executes protective actions without requiring external intervention, maintaining ease of operation while defending against sophisticated cyberattacks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11336662B2Technologies for detecting abnormal activities in an electric vehicle charging station
Publication Date: 2022.05.17 ABB E-MOBILITY BV
  • US11336662B2 patent drawing
  • US11336662B2 patent drawing
  • US11336662B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Technologies for detecting abnormal activities in an electric vehicle charging station include an apparatus. The apparatus includes circuitry configured determine a cyber security threat level for the charging station in which the electric vehicle charger is located. Additionally, the circuitry is configured to perform, as a function of the determined cyber security threat level, a responsive action to protect the charging station from a cyber security threat.