EV Charging Scheduling Across Multiple Demand Response Markets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing V2G technologies lack the capability to optimize charging and discharging of electric vehicle batteries by simultaneously considering various Demand Response (DR) markets, contract for difference, and smart charging, leading to suboptimal profit generation and power system stability.

Innovation Solution

An electric vehicle charging and discharging scheduling device and method that sets a scheduling model based on constraint and objective functions, considering contract for difference, smart charging, plus DR, and national DR, to optimize charging and discharging schedules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If V2G technology is used to enable charging and discharging of electric vehicle batteries, then power system stability and profit generation are improved, but the complexity of coordinating multiple DR markets and charging functions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower system stabilityVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the charging/discharging control into multiple independent modules: smart charging module, arbitrage trading module, plus DR module, and national DR module. Each module handles a specific function independently, reducing the overall coordination complexity while maintaining power system stability through their integrated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The scheduling model dynamically adjusts charging and discharging strategies based on real-time market conditions, electricity prices, and vehicle availability. The system transitions between different operating modes (charging, discharging, idle) dynamically to optimize profits while ensuring power system stability across varying market environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If multiple DR markets are participated in simultaneously, then profit generation is improved, but the scheduling complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprofit generationVSAvoidscheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple DR market participation strategies (smart charging, arbitrage, plus DR, national DR) into a unified scheduling model. This integrated approach allows simultaneous optimization across all markets while reducing computational complexity compared to managing each market separately, as the model coordinates all activities through a single optimization framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The scheduling model serves multiple functions simultaneously: it performs smart charging optimization, arbitrage trading, plus DR participation, and national DR participation. This multi-functional design enables the system to generate profits from multiple sources while maintaining a single coherent scheduling strategy rather than requiring separate systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If smart charging and discharging are optimized simultaneously, then profit from arbitrage transactions is improved, but the constraint management becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearbitrage profitVSAvoidconstraint management
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments constraint management into distinct categories: vehicle-specific constraints (charging/discharging limits, availability windows), market-specific constraints (arbitrage rules, DR requirements), and system-wide constraints (power flow balance, battery health). Each segment is managed independently within the optimization model, making the overall constraint management more tractable while enabling simultaneous smart charging and discharging optimization for arbitrage profits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250200524A1Electric vehicle charging and discharging scheduling device and method considering participation in electric power market
Publication Date: 2025.06.19 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20250200524A1 patent drawing
  • US20250200524A1 patent drawing
  • US20250200524A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electric vehicle charging and discharging scheduling method can include setting a scheduling model based on a constraint function and an objective function considering a contract for difference, smart charging, a plus demand response (DR), and a national DR, optimizing the set scheduling model, and performing electric vehicle charging and discharging scheduling using the optimized scheduling model. The constraint function can include a function for at least one of restrictions on charging/discharging for each electric vehicle. The objective function can include a regular scheduling function considering the contract for difference and the plus DR market, and an irregular scheduling function considering the contract for difference, the plus DR market, and a national DR market.