EV Charging Queue Management With Incentives for Early Departure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle charging systems face inefficiencies due to idle vehicles occupying charging stations, leading to increased wait times and queue lengths, especially during peak usage periods, without effective mechanisms to manage vehicle charging behaviors.

Innovation Solution

Implement a system that monitors vehicle charge levels and offers incentives to vehicles to vacate charging stations when their batteries reach certain thresholds, using a combination of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and blockchain technology to optimize charging station utilization and incentivize efficient charging practices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If vehicles are allowed to occupy charging stations for extended periods to ensure sufficient charge, then individual vehicle charging reliability is improved, but charging station utilization efficiency deteriorates and wait times increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging reliabilityVSAvoidcharging station utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts charging management strategies based on real-time conditions including battery charge levels, queue status, and vehicle needs. Charging thresholds and incentive levels are not fixed but adapt to current system state, allowing the balance between individual charging needs and overall utilization efficiency to shift dynamically rather than relying on static occupancy rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous monitoring of charge levels, queue lengths, and charging patterns, using this feedback to adjust charging thresholds, incentive offerings, and resource allocation in real-time. This closed-loop control enables the system to respond to changing conditions and optimize the trade-off between charging reliability and station utilization efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Quantity of substance

If charging thresholds are set high to ensure sufficient charge, then individual vehicle energy needs are met, but charging station occupancy time increases and wait times for other vehicles increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery charge quantityVSAvoidcharging wait time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of charging threshold from a fixed high value to a dynamic value that adjusts based on queue length, vehicle priority, and overall system conditions. When queues are short, higher thresholds ensure sufficient charge; when queues are long, thresholds are lowered to reduce occupancy time and prevent excessive wait times for other vehicles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial charging actions by offering incentives for vehicles to leave before reaching 100% charge when queue conditions warrant it. Instead of always charging to full capacity, the system performs 'partial' charging to the point where incentives are offered, balancing individual energy needs with overall system throughput and reducing wait times

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If incentives are offered to reduce charging occupancy time, then charging station throughput is improved, but system complexity and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging station throughputVSAvoidincentive management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The incentive system is designed to operate autonomously based on pre-defined rules and algorithms that automatically determine when and what incentives to offer. The system self-manages the complex decision-making process by monitoring charge levels, queue status, and calculating appropriate incentives without requiring manual intervention, thereby reducing operational complexity despite the sophisticated incentive management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250256605A1Minimizing a vehicle charge time
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US20250256605A1 patent drawing
  • US20250256605A1 patent drawing
  • US20250256605A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example operation includes one or more of determining a charge level of an electrical vehicle (EV) battery of a vehicle charging at a charging point, and offering an item to the vehicle when the charge level is at or above a charge threshold and at least one other vehicle is waiting for the charging point.