EV Charging Scheduler Using Lexicographic Objective Hierarchy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing smart charging systems for electric vehicles face challenges in dynamically adapting to changing preferences and hierarchies of conflicting objectives, such as minimizing energy cost and battery degradation, due to the difficulty in determining appropriate weights for weighted-sum approaches.

Innovation Solution

A method employing lexicographic optimization to generate a charging schedule by determining a hierarchy of charging objectives, allowing flexible adaptation without the need for predefined weights, and enabling easy configuration and expansion of objectives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a weighted-sum approach is used to combine multiple conflicting objectives, then a single objective function can be optimized, but it becomes difficult to dynamically adapt the hierarchy to changing preferences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic adaptation of objective hierarchyVSAvoidcomplexity of adjusting weights
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic objective hierarchy system where the priority ordering of multiple conflicting objectives can be changed without modifying weight parameters. The system allows users to dynamically reorder objectives (e.g., from O1>O2>O3 to O2>O1>O3) and the lexicographic optimization algorithm automatically adapts to the new hierarchy, providing versatility while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If multiple conflicting objectives are optimized simultaneously, then all objectives can be considered, but no solution optimizes all objectives together

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging schedule generation efficiencyVSAvoidoptimization precision of each objective
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the optimization problem into multiple sequential single-objective optimization steps based on a priority hierarchy. Instead of attempting to optimize all objectives simultaneously, the system solves them in sequence from highest to lowest priority (O1, then O2, then O3), where each step optimizes one objective while respecting constraints from previous steps. This segmentation enables precise optimization of each individual objective while maintaining overall system productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If the weighted-sum approach is used, then multiple objectives can be combined into one, but determining appropriate weights is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of configuring objectivesVSAvoiddifficulty of determining weights
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent fundamentally changes the parameter representation from weighted values (0-1 scale) to a discrete priority ordering system. Instead of requiring users to determine difficult-to-interpret weight values, the system uses a simple hierarchical ranking where objectives are ordered by priority (O1 > O2 > O3). This parameter transformation makes the system easier to operate while eliminating the difficulty of weight determination entirely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12393888B2Multi-objective electric vehicle charging scheduler with configurable objective hierarchy
Publication Date: 2025.08.19 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12393888B2 patent drawing
  • US12393888B2 patent drawing
  • US12393888B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for scheduling charging of electric vehicles by an electric vehicle charging system, wherein charging objectives to be considered in generating a charging schedule for one or more charging stations of the charging system are obtained, a hierarchy of the charging objectives is determined and the charging schedule is generated by performing a lexicographic optimization based on the hierarchy of the charging objectives.