Distributed EV Charging Control for Circuit Overload Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing number of Electric Vehicles (EVs) causes overloading in electrical power distribution networks due to high and non-stationary EV charging loads, leading to potential disruptions and the need for intelligent load management solutions that can optimize and redistribute power across multiple circuits, while also addressing communication reliability and scalability challenges.

Innovation Solution

A distributed control system using edge computing devices physically near electrical circuits, mirroring the hierarchical architecture of the electrical power distribution network, which performs dynamic optimization of power levels and load redistribution across multiple EV chargers, and includes a modular and scalable architecture with low-bandwidth communication, enabling independent control of EV charging loads and integration with existing electrical power distribution systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If EV chargers are installed in existing facilities, then EV charging capability is improved, but electrical power distribution network overloading occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEV charging capabilityVSAvoidelectrical power distribution network stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the EV charging load management into multiple hierarchical levels: facility-level controllers that manage aggregate charging capacity, circuit-level controllers that monitor individual circuit loads, and charger-level controllers that adjust charging rates. This segmentation allows each level to independently manage its portion of the load, preventing any single point of failure from causing system-wide overloading while maintaining overall EV charging capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts EV charging rates based on real-time electrical network conditions. Controllers continuously monitor circuit load levels and automatically modulate charging power delivery, increasing rates when capacity is available and reducing rates when circuits approach thermal limits. This dynamic response allows the system to adapt to changing conditions without requiring infrastructure upgrades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Quantity of substance

If EV charging load is concentrated on few electrical circuits, then infrastructure cost is reduced, but circuit overloading occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical circuit capacity utilizationVSAvoidcircuit overload protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary load analysis and circuit capacity assessment before allocating EV charging loads. Controllers pre-calculate optimal circuit assignments based on known circuit ratings and existing load profiles, distributing EV chargers across multiple circuits in advance to prevent concentration on single circuits. This preliminary planning ensures balanced load distribution while maximizing utilization of available circuit capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback monitoring of circuit load levels, with controllers receiving real-time data on current draw, temperature, and utilization metrics. When a circuit approaches its capacity threshold, the system automatically redistributes EV charging loads to underutilized circuits, preventing overload conditions while maintaining high overall capacity utilization across the electrical distribution system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If centralized control system is used for EV charging management, then system complexity is reduced, but communication bandwidth requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system architectureVSAvoidcommunication data volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into distributed hierarchical levels with autonomous decision-making capabilities at each tier. Facility-level controllers handle high-level charging strategy and billing, circuit-level controllers manage load allocation and circuit monitoring, and charger-level controllers execute real-time power modulation. This segmentation eliminates the need for a single centralized controller, reducing overall system complexity while minimizing communication bandwidth requirements through localized autonomous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Quantity of substance

If existing electrical power distribution network is used for EV charging, then infrastructure cost is reduced, but network overloading occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical infrastructure capacityVSAvoidnetwork load capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters including charging power levels, circuit load allocation, and voltage regulation settings to optimize the use of existing infrastructure capacity. By adjusting these parameters in real-time based on network conditions, the system extracts maximum usable capacity from existing electrical networks without requiring physical upgrades, while preventing overload conditions that would compromise reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230415600A1Solutions for building a low-cost electric vehicle charging infrastructure
Publication Date: 2023.12.28 MICROGRID LABS INC
  • US20230415600A1 patent drawing
  • US20230415600A1 patent drawing
  • US20230415600A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method to scale EV charging infrastructure incrementally at low cost using a novel distributed control system. Distributed Control system comprises of a distributed network of nodal controllers and power flow sensors minoring the hierarchal architecture of electrical power distribution network of facilities and city utilities The control system optimizes the electric power flow in the electrical circuits of the charging network given the constraints imposed by the addition of EV chargers in the electrical power distribution network and by the varying activity of EV chargers in the structure.