EV Charging Station Power Management for Multi-Source Home Energy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current smart house systems lack a common standard for device communication and energy management, making it costly and complex to integrate electric vehicle charging stations and other energy sources, especially in older homes, and fail to efficiently distribute power between producers and consumers.

Innovation Solution

An electric vehicle charging station (EVCS) with a single point of connection to the power grid, equipped with a computational device for data exchange and power management, allowing it to evaluate and control power flow from various sources, including solar energy and storage, to optimize energy use and distribution within the local network.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If smart meters are installed to manage power distribution, then energy management capability is improved, but installation cost and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy management capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The EV charging station is designed to perform multiple functions: it charges electric vehicles, manages power distribution from multiple sources (grid, solar, storage), and provides energy management capabilities. By making the charging station universal rather than single-purpose, the system avoids the need for separate smart meters and multiple specialized devices, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining energy management functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple communication protocols are implemented for device compatibility, then adaptability is improved, but manufacturing cost and maintenance effort increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice compatibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The charging station incorporates a communication interface that acts as an intermediary, capable of translating between different communication protocols. Rather than implementing multiple protocol stacks throughout the entire system, the interface layer handles protocol conversion, allowing the station to communicate with various smart meters and network devices using their native protocols while maintaining a unified internal communication standard.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Use of energy by moving object

If power is drawn from grid during peak demand, then energy availability is improved, but energy cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy availabilityVSAvoidenergy cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by charging energy storage devices (batteries) during off-peak hours when grid electricity is cheaper and more abundant. The computational device forecasts energy prices and demand patterns, then schedules charging operations in advance to avoid peak demand periods. This allows the system to have energy available during peak times without actually drawing expensive peak-demand power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The computational device continuously monitors grid energy prices, demand patterns, and the state of energy storage devices. Based on this feedback, it dynamically adjusts the charging strategy, deciding when to charge from the grid, when to use stored energy, and when to charge vehicles. This feedback loop enables the system to respond to changing energy prices and avoid expensive peak demand charging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If local energy storage is added to the network, then energy independence is improved, but initial investment cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy independenceVSAvoidinitial investment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the energy storage function with the existing EV charging station infrastructure. Rather than adding separate, standalone storage systems to each home, the charging station itself incorporates or is closely integrated with energy storage devices. This shared infrastructure approach allows multiple vehicles and even multiple homes to share the same storage capacity, reducing the per-unit investment cost while still providing energy independence benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11865942B2Electrical vehicle charging station with power management
Publication Date: 2024.01.09 EATON IND MFG
  • US11865942B2 patent drawing
  • US11865942B2 patent drawing
  • US11865942B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention concerns an electrical vehicle charging station for at least one electric vehicle in a network including at least a house, energy producers, and energy consumers.