EV Charging Station Siting Using Traffic Grid Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for identifying charging station locations are based on static optimization techniques, which fail to provide a global optimal solution and are not performed in real-time, leaving gaps in the identification of charging infrastructure.

Innovation Solution

A data-driven optimization method that utilizes daily traffic count data to divide a city into grids, estimate traffic density, cluster grids, and compute a total score based on distance and traffic penalties to identify optimal candidate locations using an iterative optimization technique.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If pure optimization techniques with a static number of charging stations are used, then the planning process is simplified, but the solution fails to provide the global optimal solution for the city

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanning process complexityVSAvoidsolution optimality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static optimization to dynamic data-driven optimization. The system continuously updates charging station locations based on real-time traffic data, grid clustering, and iterative optimization processes, allowing the solution to adapt and improve as new data becomes available, thereby achieving global optimality without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by using traffic count data to evaluate and refine charging station locations. The iterative optimization process continuously adjusts the solution based on performance metrics and traffic patterns, ensuring the system converges to the global optimal solution while maintaining manageable planning complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If data-based techniques with objective functions selected based on data nature are used, then the solution adapts to traffic patterns, but gaps remain in the identification of charging infrastructure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to traffic patternsVSAvoidcompleteness of charging infrastructure identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the city into multiple grids and further segments them into sub-clusters, allowing detailed local analysis while maintaining overall city coverage. This segmentation enables the system to identify charging station locations across all areas, eliminating gaps in infrastructure identification while adapting to local traffic patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds spatial dimensionality by dividing the city into grids and sub-clusters, transforming the problem from a one-dimensional optimization to a multi-dimensional spatial analysis. This approach ensures comprehensive coverage of all city areas while adapting to varying traffic patterns in different regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Loss of energy

If traditional optimization techniques are used, then computational resources are conserved, but the identification of charging station locations is not performed in real-time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational resource consumptionVSAvoidreal-time identification capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the city into grids and sub-clusters, allowing parallel processing of multiple regions simultaneously. This segmentation enables real-time identification of charging station locations by distributing computational tasks across different grid areas, achieving real-time performance without excessive resource consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent focuses computational resources on identifying candidate locations within each grid and sub-cluster rather than optimizing the entire city at once. This partial action approach enables real-time identification by processing manageable portions of the city concurrently, achieving real-time capability while controlling resource usage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250231042A1Method and system for identification of charging station location based on data driven optimization
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • US20250231042A1 patent drawing
  • US20250231042A1 patent drawing
  • US20250231042A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates generally to identification of charging station location based on data driven optimization. Despite the rapid growth seen in adoption of EVs, several challenges have remained, with the major concern of choosing the location of the charging infrastructure is crucial. The state-of-art techniques to identify the location of charging infrastructure/station is based on pure optimization techniques using static number of charging stations, which may not effectively output the global optimal solution for the city as it is not performed at real-time. The disclosed technique is a flow-based solution approach that is based on daily traffic count data. The disclosed technique analyses traffic condition from vehicle count data, geography of the city or area of interest, road networks, charging station operation constraints to identify a set of candidate locations required to cover entire city or area of the interest based on a score-based ranking of each candidate location.