EV Charging Station Placement Optimization Using Telematics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The transition to electric vehicles is hindered by the lack of supporting charging infrastructure, leading to consumer 'range-anxiety' due to perceived insufficient charging station availability, which affects consumer confidence and adoption.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using telematics data to optimize the placement of public electric vehicle charging stations by analyzing vehicle dynamics and geo-location data to identify clusters of candidate locations and presenting optimal locations through a human-machine interface, considering traffic patterns and driver utility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If charging stations are deployed densely across all potential locations, then consumer confidence and perceived range are improved, but infrastructure cost and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsumer confidenceVSAvoidinfrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of telematics data to identify high-demand locations before deploying charging stations. By pre-processing vehicle trajectory,停留时间, and destination data to generate candidate location clusters, the system ensures charging infrastructure is placed where it will be most needed, thereby building consumer confidence from the outset while avoiding unnecessary deployments that would increase complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of location selection from uniform distribution to demand-based distribution. By using telematics-derived parameters such as frequent destinations,停留时间 patterns, and trip purposes to weight location candidates, the system optimizes charging station placement to maximize consumer confidence impact while minimizing overall infrastructure complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If charging stations are placed only at high-demand locations identified through comprehensive data analysis, then infrastructure cost is reduced, but coverage area and accessibility may be limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment efficiencyVSAvoidcoverage area
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by differentiating charging station placement strategies across different geographic regions. Instead of uniform deployment, it identifies specific high-demand clusters within the service area using telematics data, concentrating infrastructure in locations with proven vehicle activity patterns while maintaining appropriate coverage through strategic selection of multiple localized clusters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial action by deploying charging stations at only the most critical high-demand locations rather than attempting comprehensive coverage. By selecting a subset of candidate clusters that represent the majority of charging needs identified through telematics analysis, the system achieves sufficient coverage for most users while avoiding the costs and complexities of complete area saturation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If charging infrastructure is expanded rapidly to meet perceived demand, then consumer adoption increases, but resource allocation efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadoption rateVSAvoidresource allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously analyzing telematics data from deployed vehicles to inform charging station placement decisions. Real-world vehicle trajectory, destination, and停留时间 data provide feedback on actual charging需求的 patterns, allowing the system to optimize future deployment locations based on proven demand rather than estimates, thereby improving both adoption rate and resource efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by using the vehicles' own telematics data to identify where charging infrastructure is needed. Instead of requiring external surveys or estimates, the vehicles effectively report their own charging needs through their operational data, allowing the system to allocate resources efficiently based on actual usage patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11587004B2System and method for placement optimization of public electric vehicle charging stations using telematics data
Publication Date: 2023.02.21 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11587004B2 patent drawing
  • US11587004B2 patent drawing
  • US11587004B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for placement optimization of public electric vehicle charging stations using telematics data that includes receiving vehicle telematics data from a plurality of vehicles. The system and method also includes analyzing the vehicle telematics data to determine clusters of candidate locations of the public electric vehicle charging stations and selecting a subset of nodes of a fully connected graph structure that are associated with the candidate locations as optimal locations of the public electric vehicle charging stations. The system and method further include controlling an electronic computing system to present a human machine interface to present a visualization of the optimal locations of public electric vehicle charging stations to at least one party.