Electric Motor Control Using ML Feedback in EVs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electric vehicle systems lack efficient control mechanisms for optimizing electric motor operation, leading to suboptimal performance, battery longevity, and increased wear on vehicle components, as they rely on manual driver inputs and lack adaptive responses to changing conditions.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a motor control model trained using machine learning techniques, integrated with sensors and processors to adjust power delivery to the electric motor based on real-time data from vehicle operation, including sensor data, control inputs, and environmental factors, allowing for adaptive performance modes and regulatory compliance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual driver inputs and basic control systems are used, then device complexity is reduced, but electric motor performance and adaptability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptive response to changing conditionsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously receives feedback from sensors monitoring motor operating conditions, battery state, and environmental factors. This feedback loop enables the machine learning model to dynamically adjust motor control parameters, achieving adaptive performance while maintaining manageable system complexity through integrated sensor-controller architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model autonomously determines optimal motor control strategies without requiring manual driver intervention. The system self-adjusts power delivery, torque, and operational modes based on real-time data, enabling the vehicle to serve itself in optimizing performance while reducing the complexity of manual control interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If aggressive power delivery strategies are used, then productivity is improved, but loss of energy and wear on components increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle performanceVSAvoidbattery consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters including power delivery rate, torque output, and motor speed based on real-time conditions. The machine learning model optimizes these parameters to achieve maximum productivity while minimizing energy loss, adjusting the balance between performance and efficiency according to battery state, driving conditions, and environmental factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The control system transitions from static power delivery strategies to dynamic adjustment mechanisms. Power delivery characteristics continuously adapt based on real-time sensor data, enabling the system to optimize the trade-off between productivity and energy consumption by modulating motor output in response to changing operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If real-time sensor data processing is implemented, then adaptability is improved, but use of energy and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic control capabilityVSAvoidprocessing energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system processes sensor data at varying levels of detail based on operational context. Rather than continuously processing all sensor inputs at maximum computational intensity, the machine learning model selectively processes data at appropriate granularity, reducing energy consumption while maintaining necessary adaptability for real-time motor control adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11938828B2Controlling the operation of a component in an electric vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 AVATHON INC
  • US11938828B2 patent drawing
  • US11938828B2 patent drawing
  • US11938828B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Controlling the operation of one or more components in an electric vehicle, including: receiving, from one or more vehicle operation sensors, operation data including sensor data corresponding to a condition of one or more components of the vehicle; determining, using a trained model, whether the one or more components of the vehicle are operating in an acceptable manner; and generating a control signal to adjust operation of the one or more components of the vehicle.