Vehicle Evasive Maneuver Stability Control via Differential Braking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing driver assistance systems for evasive maneuvers in vehicles often result in incorrect interventions, such as partial overlap collisions or vehicle instability, due to limitations in detecting slippery roads, overlooking obstacles, and reacting to high-speed dynamic steering inputs.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses environmental sensors and vehicle dynamics control systems to support and dampen driver steering during evasive maneuvers, generating additional yaw moments through braking interventions to achieve a safe lateral offset and stabilize the vehicle, while prioritizing steerability over braking distance in critical situations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If braking intervention is used to prevent collision, then collision risk is reduced, but braking distance increases on slippery roads leading to incorrect interventions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance reliabilityVSAvoiddistance calculation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the coefficient of friction parameter based on detected driving conditions (wet road, icy road, loose gravel) to adjust distance calculations and braking intervention thresholds, ensuring accurate distance assessment across varying road surfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection of road surface conditions and obstacle positions before initiating braking, using environment sensors to assess the situation in advance and calculate safe distances with adjusted friction coefficients, preventing incorrect late interventions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If driver steers dynamically to avoid obstacle, then avoidance maneuver is achieved, but vehicle stability is compromised leading to skidding or tipping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering response speedVSAvoidvehicle stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary counteracting braking forces to specific wheels before and during the steering maneuver to prevent excessive lateral acceleration and yaw rate, counteracting the destabilizing effect of dynamic steering while maintaining avoidance capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors lateral acceleration and yaw rate during the evasive maneuver, using this feedback to dynamically adjust braking forces on individual wheels to maintain vehicle stability throughout the maneuver

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Length of stationary object

If steering support is provided during evasive maneuver, then lateral offset is achieved, but excessive steering dynamics increase risk of tipping over

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelateral offsetVSAvoidtipping over risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies braking forces locally to specific wheels (front inside wheel or rear outside wheel) rather than uniformly, creating a targeted yaw moment that generates necessary lateral offset while minimizing overall vehicle dynamics and tipping risk

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Minimizes the risk of collisions by enabling vehicles to achieve sufficient lateral offset and maintain stability during evasive maneuvers, reducing the risk of skidding and tipping over, especially at high speeds, and ensuring safe obstacle avoidance without excessive steering dynamics.

Implementation Method 1

electronically controlled braking system which enables a driver-independent build-up and modulation of the braking forces on the individual wheels of the vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP2603408B1Method and system for regulating driving stability
Publication Date: 2017.06.21 CONTINENTAL TEVES AG & CO OHG
  • EP2603408B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2603408B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3

AI summary

Provided is a method in which the driving behaviour of a vehicle is influenced as a function of surroundings data in order to assist an avoidance manoeuvre when a collision risk is identified on the basis of the data from one or more surroundings sensors, in particular radar sensors and/or cameras, and the data from one or more vehicle sensors, in particular steering angle sensor and/or yaw rate sensor and/or wheel speed sensors, and the vehicle has an electronically regulated brake system which permits a driver-independent build-up and modulation of the brake forces at the individual wheels of the vehicle, wherein in the event of a collision risk being identified, in a first phase, a steering input by the driver is assisted, and/or in a second phase, a steering action by the driver is dampened. Also defined is an electronic control unit for a brake system.