Exoskeleton Shoulder Abutment Force Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing exoskeletons fail to provide effective support and relief for workers engaging in overhead activities, leading to musculoskeletal overload and injury due to inadequate coupling of rotational and translational degrees of freedom, resulting in reduced movement accuracy and increased risk of postural damage.

Innovation Solution

A wearable exoskeleton with a shoulder abutment, armrest, and pelvic support, featuring a flexible back element with adjustable stiffening devices, such as cables or springs, that distribute force from the arm to the back and pelvis, allowing for targeted stiffening and movement support through actuators and sensors to optimize user movement and reduce strain.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a compact device design is used to reduce device complexity, then the device becomes slimmer and more compact, but movement accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice compactnessVSAvoidmovement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements nested doll by integrating multiple degrees of freedom (rotational and translational) within a compact, body-hugging structure. The kinematic chain is nested along the user's body contours, allowing complex movements to be achieved in a space-efficient manner without sacrificing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional robotic arm designs to a body-hugging exoskeleton that utilizes the human body's three-dimensional space. By mapping translational and rotational degrees of freedom along the body's natural contours, the system achieves high movement accuracy within a compact form factor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the back element is made flexible to adapt to user movement, then adaptability improves, but structural strength deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility to user movementVSAvoidback element strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The back element is designed with dynamic stiffness properties, allowing it to adapt its rigidity based on operational requirements. The element can flex during user movement to maintain comfort and adaptability, while providing structural strength when needed to support loads and maintain postural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The back element's mechanical properties are changed dynamically during operation. Through actuators and control systems, the stiffness parameter of the back element can be adjusted in real-time, transitioning between flexible and rigid states as required by the task and user position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If stiffening devices are added to the back element to increase strength, then structural strength improves, but device complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveback element strengthVSAvoidstiffening device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stiffening devices are merged with the back element structure rather than being separate add-on components. The reinforcement elements are integrated into the back element's design, combining structural support and stiffening functions into a unified component to minimize overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Stiffening is applied locally to specific regions of the back element where structural strength is most needed, rather than making the entire back element rigid. This localized reinforcement maintains flexibility in other areas while providing targeted support, reducing the overall complexity compared to full rigidification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The exoskeleton enhances movement accuracy and reduces musculoskeletal overload by distributing force effectively, enabling workers to perform overhead tasks for extended periods without injury, while maintaining flexibility and adaptability to individual user needs.

Implementation Method 1

The first stiffening device is designed to stiffen the first area-flexible back element in a targeted manner in a bending direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical stiffening:

Implementation Method 2

This exoskeleton can both support and relieve the user by directing the force that occurs on the user's arm to the user's back and pelvis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce transmission: Force

Data Source

PatentEP3429804B1Exoskeleton for a human being
Publication Date: 2023.06.14 EXOIQ GMBH
  • EP3429804B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3429804B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3429804B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In order to avoid damage caused by overloading for physically working people and to support the execution of actions, an exoskeleton is provided as a support device with a device for implementing rotational and translatory human movements. The exoskeleton, which is coupled to at least one body part of a person, comprises at least one man-technology interface, a device for implementing rotational and translatory human movements and an actuating unit which under certain circumstances is supplemented by a sensor system and a controller.