Exoskeleton Vertebral Segment With Elastic Joints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional exoskeletons lack flexibility and mobility due to their non-articulated back design, restricting the user's ability to bend and move freely, which can lead to reduced mobility and increased risk of musculoskeletal disorders.

Innovation Solution

A back module with a vertebral column segment comprising multiple stacked vertebral elements connected by a flexible elastic element, allowing for movement and restoring force to maintain equilibrium, along with electrical and data transmission cables for actuator and sensor connectivity, enabling vertical load transmission and adaptable morphology.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a non-articulated back structure is used, then structural simplicity is improved, but user mobility and freedom of movement deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveback structure complexityVSAvoiduser mobility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The back structure is divided into multiple articulated segments (vertebral elements) that can move relative to each other, allowing the back to bend and flex while maintaining structural support. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by providing both complexity (multiple moving parts) and mobility (flexibility), eliminating the limitation of non-articulated designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The back structure transitions from a static, rigid configuration to a dynamic, articulated system with multiple degrees of freedom. The vertebral elements are connected through joints that enable movement, allowing the structure to adapt to user motion while maintaining load-bearing capacity, thus improving mobility without sacrificing structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If a rigid back structure is used, then load-bearing capacity is improved, but freedom of movement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidfreedom of movement
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The rigid back structure is segmented into multiple vertebral elements connected by joints, distributing the load across multiple components while allowing relative movement between segments. This maintains overall load-bearing capacity while enabling flexibility and freedom of movement that a single rigid structure cannot provide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the back structure have different properties: the vertebral elements maintain rigidity for load-bearing, while the connections between them provide flexibility for movement. This local differentiation of mechanical properties resolves the contradiction between strength and mobility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If the number of vertebral elements is increased, then adaptability to user morphology is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to user morphologyVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The back structure uses a modular segmented design where the number of vertebral elements can be adjusted to match different user morphologies. This segmentation allows customization and adaptation to various body types while keeping each individual component relatively simple, balancing adaptability with manageable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances user mobility by allowing spinal flexibility and load distribution while maintaining structural integrity, reducing musculoskeletal strain and improving ergonomic compatibility.

Implementation Method 1

the flexible connection element being elastic so that, during a movement of the user's back, the flexible connection element allows a displacement of the vertebral elements relative to each other, while exerting a restoring force tending to bring the segment of the vertebral column back to the position of stable equilibrium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3393731B1Back portion for an exoskeleton structure
Publication Date: 2022.02.16 SAFRAN ELECTRONICS & DEFENSE (FR)
  • EP3393731B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3393731B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3393731B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The invention concerns a back portion (2) for an exoskeleton structure, comprising a spinal column segment (21) intended to extend along a spinal column of a user, the spinal column segment (21) comprising a plurality of vertebra elements (211), stacked on top of each other, and one flexible connection element (212) linking the vertebra elements (211) together, the spinal column segment (21) having a stable equilibrium position in which the flexible connection element (212) keeps the vertebra elements (211) pressed together, and the flexible connection element (212) being resilient such that, during a movement of the back of the user, the flexible connection element (212) allows the vertebra elements (211) to move relative to each other, while exerting a return force tending to return the spinal column segment (21) to the stable equilibrium position.