Single-Handed Extendable Cosmetic Applicator Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Many users find it difficult, inconvenient, and sometimes unsafe to apply cosmetics with only one hand, as existing cosmetic applicators are not designed for single-handed operation.

Innovation Solution

A single-handed extendable cosmetic applicator with a rotatable body shell portion that allows linear and longitudinal translation of the applicator stem, enabling easy extension and retraction with one hand, and compatibility with multiple cosmetic types through interchangeable components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If cosmetic applicators are designed for traditional two-handed operation, then stability and control during application are improved, but ease of operation with one hand deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesingle-handed operationVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The applicator stem is nested within the body shell, allowing it to extend and retract along a rotation path. The stem passes through an enclosed aperture in the second body shell portion and is guided by translation channels, creating a compact nested structure that enables single-handed operation while maintaining control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The applicator stem is made dynamically extendable and retractable through rotational motion of the second body shell portion. The stem translates linearly along a rotation path when the body shell rotates, transforming rotational input into linear extension/retraction motion for adaptable application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the applicator stem is made extendable and retractable, then ease of application to hard-to-reach areas is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicator extension and retractionVSAvoidbody shell mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The applicator stem extends and retracts by moving along a rotation path rather than simple linear translation. The second body shell portion rotates about a longitudinal axis, causing the stem to follow a curved rotation path that combines rotational and translational motion dimensions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Applicator guide members act as intermediaries between the rotating body shell and the applicator stem. These guide members engage with the stem and translate the rotational motion of the body shell into controlled linear extension and retraction of the stem along the rotation path

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If the applicator is designed for single-handed operation, then user convenience is improved, but application precision and control may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesingle-handed controlVSAvoidapplication precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The rotation mechanism is self-contained within the applicator body, requiring only minimal user input to initiate and control stem extension/retraction. The user simply rotates the body shell, and the self-contained guide members and translation channels automatically control the stem's motion along the rotation path

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The applicator stem is pre-positioned within the body shell and the guide members are pre-configured along the rotation path. When the user rotates the body shell, the pre-positioned components immediately engage and guide the stem's motion, ensuring precise control from the start of the rotation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If the applicator uses fixed cosmetic contents, then device simplicity is improved, but adaptability to different cosmetic types deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with multiple cosmetic typesVSAvoidinterchangeable components
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The applicator body shell and stem mechanism serve multiple functions: they can accommodate different types of cosmetic products (mascara, lip liner, lip gloss) and work with various applicator surfaces (bristles, sponges, wands). The universal rotation and extension mechanism adapts to different cosmetic application needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11357310B2Single-handed extendable cosmetic applicator
Publication Date: 2022.06.14 JOYFULLY YOU LLC
  • US11357310B2 patent drawing
  • US11357310B2 patent drawing
  • US11357310B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A single-handed extendable cosmetic applicator having an applicator body with a first, second, and third body shell portion and a selectively removable cover disposed at a second end of the applicator body that is operably configured to dispose an opening. The applicator body encapsulates a cosmetic applicator stem with an applicator surface. When the applicator is desired to be used, the user may rotate the second body shell portion with respect to the first body shell portion to cause the applicator surface to extend and retract through the opening with a single hand of a user. In some embodiments, the third shell portion may be selectively removable and include different cosmetic products for desired use by the user.