Extremum-Seeking Engine Control for Real-Time Fuel Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing engine control systems fail to optimize engine performance in real-time, particularly in achieving maximum fuel efficiency and adapting to varying operating conditions efficiently.

Innovation Solution

The method involves determining initial engine control parameters based on detected operating conditions, artificially perturbing these parameters using extremum-seeking control to converge towards target performance variables, such as fuel efficiency, and repeatedly adjusting them until optimal values are achieved, with an engine controller utilizing a processor and memory to execute these operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional engine control systems use fixed control parameters from lookup tables, then the control system is simple to implement, but the engine cannot adapt to varying operating conditions to achieve maximum fuel efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to varying operating conditionsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system transitions from static lookup table values to dynamic parameter adjustment through extremum-seeking control. The system continuously adapts control parameters by applying perturbations and observing performance changes, enabling real-time optimization of fuel efficiency while maintaining reasonable computational complexity through iterative adjustment rather than complex pre-computed maps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The engine control system performs self-optimization by automatically adjusting its own control parameters through the extremum-seeking algorithm. The system monitors its own performance (fuel efficiency) and autonomously modifies control settings without requiring external intervention or complex pre-programmed strategies, achieving adaptability through self-directed learning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If real-time optimization is implemented through continuous parameter adjustment, then fuel efficiency is improved, but the computational load and control complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The extremum-seeking control applies small perturbations to control parameters rather than attempting to optimize all parameters simultaneously. This partial action approach focuses computational effort on incremental adjustments that yield measurable fuel efficiency improvements, avoiding the excessive complexity of comprehensive real-time optimization while achieving practical performance gains

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization process uses periodic perturbation of control parameters at defined intervals rather than continuous adjustment. This periodic action allows the system to maintain fuel efficiency optimization while reducing computational burden by evaluating performance at discrete time points, balancing productivity improvement with acceptable control complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Manufacturing precision

If extremum-seeking control with perturbation signals is used to optimize performance, then optimal engine settings are achieved, but measurement accuracy requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine performance optimization precisionVSAvoidperformance variable measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from performance measurements to guide parameter optimization. By continuously monitoring engine performance variables and comparing actual results with target values, the extremum-seeking control adjusts parameters to minimize the difference, achieving high optimization precision while compensating for measurement uncertainties through iterative correction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The perturbation signal acts as an intermediary that amplifies the relationship between control parameter changes and performance outcomes. By introducing known perturbations and observing the resulting performance variations, the system can infer optimal settings even with moderate measurement precision, as the perturbation creates detectable signal patterns that guide optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8924125B2Perturbing engine performance measurements to determine optimal engine control settings
Publication Date: 2014.12.30 ROBERT BOSCH CORP
  • US8924125B2 patent drawing
  • US8924125B2 patent drawing
  • US8924125B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for optimizing a performance of a vehicle engine are provided. The method includes determining an initial value for a first engine control parameter based on one or more detected operating conditions of the vehicle engine, determining a value of an engine performance variable, and artificially perturbing the determined value of the engine performance variable. The initial value for the first engine control parameter is then adjusted based on the perturbed engine performance variable causing the engine performance variable to approach a target engine performance variable. Operation of the vehicle engine is controlled based on the adjusted initial value for the first engine control parameter. These acts are repeated until the engine performance variable approaches the target engine performance variable.