Automated FIB Sample Preparation Using Image Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing complexity and miniaturization of devices make manual production of TEM analysis samples using charged particle beams labor-intensive and prone to errors, limiting the ability of unskilled technicians to accurately determine the working end position, thus necessitating a more efficient and automated process.

Innovation Solution

An automatic working apparatus that includes a structure information obtaining unit, a working end position obtaining unit, an image obtaining unit, and a determining unit to compare pre-working and real-time images of the sample to determine if the charged particle beam has reached the correct end position, allowing for automated sample production without human intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual working is performed by an operator to leave only one desired structural body, then the working can be performed with flexibility, but the work takes a very long time and increases the risk of errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in manual workingVSAvoidwork efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic working end position determination by itself using image recognition and comparison algorithms, eliminating the need for operator intervention. The apparatus autonomously compares obtained images with pre-stored structure information to determine when working should end, thereby increasing productivity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection and decision-making by operators with an automated image processing system. The determining unit uses computational algorithms to compare images and identify structural bodies, substituting human cognitive processes with mechanical/optical systems that operate faster and without fatigue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If an unskilled technician performs manual working, then labor availability increases, but the work takes a very long time and accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavailability of techniciansVSAvoidaccuracy of working end position determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously obtains images during working, compares them with pre-stored structure information, and uses the comparison results to determine the working end position. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures that even unskilled technicians can achieve high precision by relying on the automated determination system rather than manual skill.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent stores pre-acquired images representing the complete structure information as a reference template. During working, the system compares real-time images against this stored copy to identify when the desired structural body remains, eliminating the need for technicians to have expert knowledge of the target structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If manual working is performed with careful observation, then accuracy can be maintained, but the work takes a very long time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of working end position determinationVSAvoidtime for sample production
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The image obtaining unit continuously captures images during the working process without interruption, and the determining unit continuously compares these images with stored structure information. This continuous automated monitoring enables rapid determination of the working end position, maintaining high accuracy while dramatically reducing the time required compared to intermittent manual observation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces slow manual visual observation and decision-making with automated image processing systems that can analyze multiple images per second. The computational comparison of images with stored structure information occurs much faster than human visual processing, thereby reducing time loss while maintaining or improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If automated working is implemented, then productivity increases, but the ability to handle complex structures may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of sample productionVSAvoidability to handle complex device structures
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system enhances its adaptability to complex structures by changing the parameters of the image processing and pattern recognition algorithms. By adjusting sensitivity thresholds, comparison criteria, and structural recognition parameters, the automated system can accommodate varying degrees of structural complexity while maintaining high productivity through rapid automated determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus enables accurate and efficient determination of the working end position for charged particle beams, reducing labor and skill dependency, thereby improving the production efficiency and reliability of TEM analysis samples.

Implementation Method 1

irradiating the sample with a charged particle beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSputtering: Sputtering

Implementation Method 2

irradiating the sample with a charged particle beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAblation: Ablation

Implementation Method 3

obtain a working surface image, the working surface image being obtained by imaging a working surface that appears at a position where the sample is irradiated with the charged particle beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSecondary electron emission: Electron Impact Desorption

Data Source

PatentUS10971330B2Automatic processing device
Publication Date: 2021.04.06 HITACHI HIGH TECH ANALYSIS CORP
  • US10971330B2 patent drawing
  • US10971330B2 patent drawing
  • US10971330B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This automatic processing device for fabricating a sample piece from a sample by irradiating the sample with a charged particle beam is provided with: a structural information acquiring unit which acquires structural information indicating the structure of the sample before processing; a processing termination position acquiring unit which acquires termination position specifying information specifying a processing termination position corresponding to the structure of the sample; an image acquiring unit which acquires a processed surface image in which a processed surface appearing at the position at which the sample has been irradiated by the charged particle beam is captured; and a determining unit which determines whether the position of the processing by the charged particle beam has reached the termination position, on the basis of a comparison between the structural information acquired by the structural information acquiring unit and the processed surface image acquired by the image acquiring unit.