Addressable Field Emission Array for Thermodynamic Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current field emission devices face inefficiencies in controlling electron emission and thermodynamic efficiency due to limitations in the design of cathode, anode, gate, and suppressor configurations, leading to suboptimal performance in heat engines and related applications.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an array of field emission devices with a cathode, anode, gate, and suppressor, where each component is receptive to specific power sources to control electron emission and thermodynamic efficiency, including a suppressor electric potential to decelerate electrons and bind them in the anode region, optimizing electron flow and heat transfer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If conventional field emission device configurations are used, then device simplicity is maintained, but thermodynamic efficiency and power output are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into multiple independently controllable field emission devices arranged in an array, with each device having its own cathode, anode, gate, and suppressor. This segmentation allows individual optimization of each device's electron emission and heat transfer characteristics, thereby increasing overall power output while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic control of electron emission by applying variable electric potentials to gates and suppressors. The circuitry adjusts the electric potential of suppressors in real-time to optimize electron flow and heat transfer conditions, enabling the device to adapt to changing operational requirements and maximize power output under different conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of energy

If conventional field emission device configurations are used, then device simplicity is maintained, but thermodynamic efficiency is suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermodynamic efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback control mechanisms where circuitry monitors the performance of each field emission device and adjusts the suppressor electric potentials accordingly. This feedback system optimizes electron emission and heat transfer processes in real-time, minimizing energy losses and improving thermodynamic efficiency while automatically compensating for variations in device performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by varying the electric potentials applied to suppressors and gates to optimize device performance. By dynamically adjusting these electrical parameters, the system maximizes thermodynamic efficiency through optimized electron flow control and heat transfer conditions without requiring fundamental changes to the device structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If suppressor electric potential is applied to decelerate electrons, then electron flow control is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectron flow controlVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The suppressor serves multiple functions: it decelerates electrons to improve flow control, prevents electron backflow to the anode, and enables dynamic adjustment of emission characteristics. This multi-functionality justifies the added complexity by providing comprehensive control over electron behavior with a single component that performs several critical operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The suppressor acts as an intermediary element between the gate and anode, mediating electron flow by decelerating electrons after they pass through the gate. This intermediary component provides fine-grained control over electron energy and direction, improving ease of operation by allowing independent optimization of emission and collection processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances the thermodynamic efficiency and power output of heat engines by controlling electron emission and heat flow, improving the overall performance and efficiency of the device.

Implementation Method 1

a gate positioned between the anode and the cathode, the gate being receptive to a second power source to produce a gate electric potential selected to induce electron emission from the cathode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectField emission: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 2

a suppressor positioned between the gate and the anode, the suppressor being receptive to a third power source to produce a suppressor electric potential selected to provide a force on an electron in a direction pointing towards the suppressor in a region between the suppressor and the anode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric field force: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentUS8810161B2Addressable array of field emission devices
Publication Date: 2014.08.19 MODERN HYDROGEN INC
  • US8810161B2 patent drawing
  • US8810161B2 patent drawing
  • US8810161B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Field emission devices are configured in addressable arrays.