Fin Selector With Gated RRAM For Memory Scalability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current RRAM technologies face challenges with scalability, poor resistance uniformity, smaller memory margin, and poor performance of back-end-of-line rectifying diode selectors, limiting their ability to achieve high densities and multi-bit capabilities.

Innovation Solution

The method involves forming a fin selector with a gated RRAM structure, which includes forming a bottom electrode layer and a hardmask on a semiconductor substrate, etching to create a fin-like structure, and then depositing dummy gate stacks, spacers, and interlayer dielectric to create cavities for the RRAM layer, which is made of transition metals, improving resistance distribution and memory margin.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If planar bottom electrode is used, then device area is reduced, but resistance uniformity deteriorates due to increased filament current paths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice areaVSAvoidresistance uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the bottom electrode from the planar configuration into a vertical plug structure. This segmentation limits the filament current paths to a controlled vertical region, reducing the number of parallel conduction paths and improving resistance uniformity while maintaining compact device area through vertical integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a two-dimensional planar bottom electrode to a three-dimensional vertical plug structure. This dimensional change confines the filament formation to a vertical pathway, reducing lateral current spread and improving resistance uniformity without increasing device footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Area of stationary object

If 1D1R RRAM with metal oxide diodes is used, then cell size is reduced to 4F2, but diode performance deteriorates with low forward current and high Vdd requirement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell sizeVSAvoiddiode performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the diode structure from metal oxide to a vertical fin selector with gated RRAM. This parameter change enables better rectifying properties and tunable characteristics while maintaining the compact 4F2 cell size, improving forward current and reducing Vdd requirements through the fin-based selector architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite structure combining fin selector with gated RRAM, integrating the selector and memory functions in a unified vertical architecture. This composite approach improves diode performance through better material composition and structural design while maintaining compact cell size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Manufacturing precision

If bottom plug electrode is used to limit filament paths, then resistance distribution improves, but scalability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereset current distributionVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal fin selector structure that serves multiple functions: it acts as the bottom electrode, provides the selector diode function, and enables scalable fabrication. This multi-functional vertical fin structure improves reset current distribution while maintaining ease of manufacture through standard semiconductor fabrication processes that can be scaled to high densities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If fin selector with gated RRAM is used, then scalability and multi-bit capability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovescalabilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes vertical dimensionality with the fin selector structure, enabling multi-bit capability through stacked or adjacent fin configurations. This vertical integration improves scalability by reducing lateral footprint while the modular fin architecture manages complexity through repetitive, standardized structural units that can be fabricated using existing semiconductor processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10424732B2Fin selector with gated RRAM
Publication Date: 2019.09.24 GLOBALFOUNDRIES SINGAPORE PTE LTD
  • US10424732B2 patent drawing
  • US10424732B2 patent drawing
  • US10424732B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of fabricating a fin selector with a gated RRAM and the resulting device are disclosed. Embodiments include forming a bottom electrode layer and a hardmask on a semiconductor substrate; etching the hardmask, bottom electrode layer, and semiconductor substrate to form a fin-like structure; forming first and second dummy gate stacks on first and second side surfaces of the fin-like structure, respectively; forming spacers on vertical surfaces of the first and second dummy gate stacks; forming an ILD surrounding the spacers; removing the first and second dummy gate stacks, forming first and second cavities on first and second sides of the fin-like structure; forming an RRAM layer on the first and second side surfaces of the fin-like structure in the first and second cavities, respectively; and filling each of the first and second cavities with a top electrode.