Fish Fillet Dark Meat Removal Using Optical-Guided Sequential Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for removing dark meat from fish fillets, such as tuna, are inefficient and yield-loss prone due to the inhomogeneous muscle structure, requiring manual processing and additional cooking steps, which are time-consuming and dependent on human skill.

Innovation Solution

An automated system comprising a conveying unit, multiple cutting apparatuses, and detection means, controlled by a central device, to precisely remove dark meat strips from fish fillets by sequential incisions and alignment, allowing for precise and efficient removal without cooking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual removal of red meat is performed, then processing can be adapted to individual fish fillet structures, but processing time increases and yield losses occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAdaptability to individual fish fillet structuresVSAvoidProcessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical cutting with an automated optical-mechanical system. A camera detects the red meat distribution and creates a digital map, which is then processed by a control unit to automatically guide cutting apparatuses, substituting human skill with automated detection and control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a digital copy or map of the red meat distribution within the fish fillet using optical detection. This digital representation is then used by the control system to plan and execute precise cutting paths without requiring manual inspection or adaptation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If cooking is performed before processing, then red meat becomes easier to identify, but additional time-intensive work steps are required

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDetectability of red meatVSAvoidAdditional cooking time
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces thermal cooking with optical detection methods. Cameras and sensors detect the red meat based on its optical properties (color, reflectance) in the raw state, eliminating the need for thermal processing to enhance visibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the detection parameter from thermal state (cooked vs. raw) to optical properties (color, reflectance, absorption). By detecting red meat based on its inherent optical characteristics in raw fish, the system avoids the time-consuming cooking step while maintaining detection accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If V-shaped cutting apparatus is used, then cutting process is simplified, but red meat removal is incomplete or light meat is removed

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCutting apparatus simplicityVSAvoidRed meat removal precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static V-shaped cutting geometry into a dynamic, adaptive cutting path. The cutting apparatus positions and orientations are continuously adjusted based on real-time detection data and processed images, allowing the cutting path to adapt to the actual red meat distribution rather than following a fixed geometric pattern

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the cutting process into multiple independent cutting steps or passes. Instead of attempting to remove all red meat in a single V-shaped cut, the system divides the removal into sequential operations that can target different portions of red meat more precisely, reducing both incomplete removal and light meat loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If automated cutting system is implemented, then processing speed increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveProcessing speedVSAvoidSystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a multi-functional integrated system where a single control unit handles image processing, pattern recognition, cutting path planning, and apparatus control. The detection system serves multiple purposes including red meat identification, boundary detection, and quality assessment, reducing the need for separate specialized components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12557820B2Arrangement and method for automatically removing a strip consisting of dark meat from a fish fillet
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 NORDISCHER MASCHINENBAU RUD BAADER GMBH CO KG
  • US12557820B2 patent drawing
  • US12557820B2 patent drawing
  • US12557820B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An arrangement for automatically removing a strip of dark meat from a fish fillet has a conveying unit for transporting the fish fillet from an inlet to an outlet area in a transport direction along a transport path. Starting from the inlet area, successively along the transport path, are provided: a detector for detecting dark meat; a first cutting apparatus for removing a middle partial strip of dark meat; an opener for opening up the fillet such that the cut surfaces of a ventral-side partial and of a dorsal-side partial strip of dark meat point upwards; a cutting unit for removing the partial strips, the cutting unit comprising second and third cutting apparatuses for removing the ventral and dorsal-side partial strips. A control device is connected to the detector and the cutting apparatus, and all cuts are based on information from the detector.