Flash Memory Erase Verification Voltage for Cycling Degradation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

NAND-type flash memory apparatuses face challenges in achieving a balance between program interference and cycling degradation due to inappropriate setting of erase verification voltage, which worsens with increasing program/erase cycling.

Innovation Solution

A flash memory apparatus and method that dynamically adjusts the erase verification voltage based on the current pulse count value required for erase verification, recording changes in pulse count and adjusting the voltage to mitigate interference and degradation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If the erase verification voltage is set too high, then program interference is reduced, but cycling degradation worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogram interferenceVSAvoidcycling degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the erase verification voltage adjustable rather than fixed. The voltage is dynamically changed based on the number of program/erase cycling operations performed. In early stages, a higher voltage is used to minimize program interference, while in later stages, the voltage is reduced to minimize cycling degradation, thus resolving the contradiction between these two harmful factors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of erase verification voltage based on the cycling stage. By monitoring the number of program/erase cycling operations and adjusting the voltage parameter accordingly, the system adapts to different operational conditions. This parameter change allows the system to optimize performance at each stage, reducing both program interference and cycling degradation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the erase verification voltage is set too low, then cycling degradation is reduced, but program interference worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecycling degradationVSAvoidprogram interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the erase verification voltage based on the current cycling stage. Rather than using a fixed low voltage that causes program interference in early stages, the system starts with a higher voltage and gradually reduces it as cycling progresses, thereby minimizing both program interference and cycling degradation at appropriate times

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by modifying the erase verification voltage based on the number of program/erase cycling operations. This dynamic parameter adjustment ensures that the voltage is optimized for each cycling stage, preventing program interference when needed and reducing cycling degradation when appropriate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a fixed erase verification voltage is used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to different cycling stages worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol mechanismVSAvoidadaptability to cycling stages
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a dynamic control mechanism that adjusts the erase verification voltage based on the number of program/erase cycling operations. This dynamic approach, while increasing some control complexity, provides significant adaptability to different cycling stages, allowing the system to optimize performance throughout the product's lifecycle

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback by monitoring the number of program/erase cycling operations and using this information to adjust the erase verification voltage. This feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to changing conditions and optimize performance at each cycling stage, justifying the additional control complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260094654A1Flash memory apparatus and erasing method thereof
Publication Date: 2026.04.02 WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORP
  • US20260094654A1 patent drawing
  • US20260094654A1 patent drawing
  • US20260094654A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A flash memory apparatus and an erasing method thereof are provided. The erasing method includes the following steps. Memory blocks are operated according to an operation command. After any one of the memory blocks undergoes a program/erase cycling, whether an accumulated cycle count of the program/erase cycling of the any one of the memory blocks reaches one of multiple interruption points is determined. When the cycle count of the any one of the memory blocks reaches the one of the interruption points, a current pulse count value of a step pulse required for the any one of the memory blocks to pass an erase verification during the program/erase cycling is recorded. An erase verification voltage for the erase verification is adjusted according to the current pulse count value.