Flash Memory Over-Erase Correction via Bit Line Leakage Current Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing over erase correction methods for flash memory arrays are inefficient and power-intensive, leading to ineffective correction due to excessive bit line leakage current, which can cause read errors and programming failures, especially when the charge pump voltage drops below a certain threshold.

Innovation Solution

The method involves controlling a column decoder to selectively output control signals to a bit line exchange unit based on the magnitude of bit line leakage current, allowing for efficient over erase correction by alternating the selection of bit lines during the correction process, thereby reducing power consumption and maintaining effective voltage levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all bit lines are selected during over erase correction, then correction effectiveness is improved, but power consumption increases due to huge leakage current

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveover erase correction effectivenessVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the bit lines into multiple groups and selects only a subset of bit lines for over erase correction at any given time, rather than correcting all bit lines simultaneously. This segmentation approach reduces the total leakage current drawn from the charge pump while still achieving correction effectiveness across the entire memory array through multiple correction cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If all gates are biased positively to reduce correction time, then productivity is improved, but charge pump voltage drops below threshold making correction ineffective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection timeVSAvoidcorrection effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different voltage biases to different groups of word lines during over erase correction. Specifically, some word lines are biased at 0V while others are biased at a positive voltage, allowing selective correction of specific bit line groups. This local differentiation enables the charge pump to maintain sufficient voltage levels for effective correction while reducing total power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Use of energy by moving object

If bit line leakage current is reduced by selective selection, then power consumption is reduced, but correction time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidcorrection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements over erase correction in multiple periodic cycles, where each cycle corrects a subset of bit lines. Between cycles, the system can reconfigure the bit line selections and apply fresh charge pump voltage. This periodic approach distributes the correction task over time, maintaining lower power consumption per cycle while achieving complete correction across all bit lines through repeated cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces bit line leakage and ensures successful over erase correction while minimizing power usage, even when the charge pump voltage is low, thus preventing read errors and programming failures.

Implementation Method 1

drains of the cells are biased with a charge pump voltage, which is couple to the corresponding bit lines, and thus, the hot electrons are injected into the floating gate again to increase the threshold voltage of the cells

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCharge pump: Pump

Implementation Method 2

the hot electrons are injected into the floating gate again to increase the threshold voltage of the cells

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHot electron injection: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 3

Fowler-Nordheim (FN) tunneling is typically applied to a cell of the flash memory, which pulls electrons from a floating gate of the cell through a tunneling oxide layer to a channel region in the cell

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFowler-Nordheim tunneling: Electron Beam

Data Source

PatentUS8081520B2Over erase correction method of flash memory apparatus
Publication Date: 2011.12.20 ELITE SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US8081520B2 patent drawing
  • US8081520B2 patent drawing
  • US8081520B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An over erase correction method of a flash memory apparatus is provided. The flash memory apparatus includes at least a microprocessor, a memory array, a bit line exchange unit and a column decoder. By controlling the column decoder of the flash memory during a period of the over-erase correction, the column decoder outputs control signals to the bit line exchange unit for selecting at least one of the bit lines according to a magnitude of the bit line leakage current. The drop in the charge pump voltage due to the bit line leakage current is reduced, and thus, the over-erase correction is executed effectively during the period of the over-erase correction.