Flavour Composition Analysis Using Partial Aroma Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aroma and flavour evaluation methods lack a robust sensory protocol for assessing quantitative data on individual and overall quality attributes of aroma compounds, ignoring taste interactions and relying on binary qualitative assessments.

Innovation Solution

A method involving partial reduction (5-95%) of aroma compounds, combined with a Same-Different sensory test using a larger panel of untrained assessors, to analyze flavour samples and account for taste-odour interactions, ensuring robust statistical analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If binary omission methods (complete removal of compounds) are used, then qualitative data on compound necessity is obtained, but quantitative assessment of compound importance and optimal amounts cannot be determined

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantitative assessment precisionVSAvoidmethod complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from binary omission (0% or 100% presence) to graduated omission levels (5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% reduction). This allows quantitative assessment of compound importance by determining the threshold at which sensory detection occurs, providing precise measurement of minimal effective concentrations while maintaining systematic methodology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by implementing incomplete omission rather than complete removal. By reducing compound amounts to specific percentages (e.g., 50% reduction) rather than eliminating them entirely, the method enables determination of optimal formulation amounts and thresholds of sensory detection, bridging the gap between complete omission and full presence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Adaptability or versatility

If only smell-based evaluation is used, then aroma compound perception is assessed, but taste-aroma interactions in flavour perception are neglected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensory evaluation scopeVSAvoidtaste interaction information
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a dual-mode evaluation system that functions for both orthonasal (smell) and retronasal (taste-aroma interaction) assessment. The same graduated omission methodology and statistical analysis framework are universally applied across different sensory delivery modes, enabling comprehensive flavour perception analysis that captures both pure aroma and integrated taste-aroma effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds another dimension by transitioning from unidimensional smell-only evaluation to bidimensional assessment incorporating both orthonasal and retronasal delivery. This dimensional expansion captures taste-aroma interactions in the retronasal pathway while maintaining aroma assessment capability, providing holistic flavour perception data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If instrumental analysis is used to identify aroma compounds, then chemical composition is determined, but consumer perception and sensory quality attributes cannot be assessed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical composition accuracyVSAvoidsensory perception information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces sensory evaluation as an intermediary between instrumental chemical analysis and consumer perception. The systematic graduated omission method acts as a mediator that translates chemical composition data into sensory quality attributes, bridging the gap by identifying which compounds contribute meaningfully to perceived flavour characteristics and consumer acceptance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using sensory evaluation results to inform and refine flavour formulation. The quantitative data on compound importance thresholds and minimal effective concentrations provides feedback to guide optimal formulation decisions, ensuring that chemical analysis outcomes are translated into perceptually relevant flavour designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2893340B1Method of analysing the components of a flavour sample
Publication Date: 2026.04.29 MARS INC
  • EP2893340B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2893340B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2893340B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method of analysing the components of a flavour sample comprising the steps of a) preparing a composition comprising a number (n) of aroma compounds to form a replica of a flavour; b) preparing a further composition comprising the same aroma and/or taste compounds with one of the components being reduced in amount by from 5 to 95% compared to the amount in the first composition; and c) comparing the aroma and / or taste of the first and second compositions.