Fleet Charging Site Planning for Peak Power and Dwell Periods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack an efficient method to determine and meet the energy supply requirements for multiple battery-powered vehicles at candidate charge sites, as they fail to accurately identify dwell periods, energy consumption, and energy replenishment, leading to inadequate charging infrastructure planning.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that identify dwell periods, chargeable dwell periods, and energy consumption of vehicles, determining energy replenishable and required power supply at candidate charge sites by analyzing vehicle data, including location, acceleration, and motion data, to calculate supply requirements for peak demand and infrastructure needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If charging infrastructure is planned without accurate identification of dwell periods and energy consumption, then infrastructure planning is simplified, but energy supply requirements cannot be met and charging reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging reliabilityVSAvoidinfrastructure planning complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of vehicle dwell periods, locations, and energy consumption patterns before charging infrastructure is deployed. By pre-identifying chargeable dwell periods and calculating energy requirements, the system ensures that infrastructure planning is based on accurate data, thereby guaranteeing charging reliability without adding operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The method segments vehicle operation into distinct dwell periods and active periods, further dividing dwell periods into chargeable and non-chargeable segments. This segmentation allows for precise calculation of energy consumption and supply requirements during chargeable periods, ensuring reliable charging planning while maintaining manageable system complexity through structured data organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If energy supply requirements are not accurately determined for peak demand, then infrastructure cost is reduced, but energy supply sufficiency during peak demand deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy supply sufficiencyVSAvoidsupply requirement calculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates energy supply requirements by analyzing historical vehicle data to identify peak demand periods and chargeable dwell periods. This preliminary calculation ensures that sufficient energy supply capacity is planned for peak demand scenarios before they occur, while the automated calculation process prevents excessive complexity in the planning stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The method uses vehicle data feedback loops to continuously monitor and refine energy consumption patterns and dwell period identification. This feedback mechanism ensures accurate determination of peak demand requirements and energy supply sufficiency, while the iterative refinement process automates complexity management through data-driven adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the number of simultaneously charging vehicles is not accommodated, then infrastructure capacity is reduced, but charging availability during high-demand periods deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging capacity adaptabilityVSAvoidvehicle coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the fleet into individual vehicle units with distinct dwell period patterns, allowing independent analysis of each vehicle's charging requirements. This segmentation enables the infrastructure to adaptively plan capacity for multiple simultaneous chargers based on actual vehicle behavior data, ensuring charging availability during high-demand periods while managing coordination complexity through modular vehicle-level tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method dynamically adjusts charging capacity planning based on real-time identification of chargeable dwell periods and vehicle locations. By continuously updating the understanding of how many vehicles may simultaneously require charging, the system adapts infrastructure capacity requirements to actual usage patterns, ensuring availability during peak periods while avoiding over-provisioning that would increase complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240017638A1Methods for implementing vehicle charging infrastructure
Publication Date: 2024.01.18 GEOTAB INC
  • US20240017638A1 patent drawing
  • US20240017638A1 patent drawing
  • US20240017638A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for determining supply requirements for charging a plurality of vehicles are described. Based on real-world data for a plurality of vehicles, operation of comparable battery-powered vehicles is simulated. Energy consumption by the vehicles and energy replenishable to the vehicles is simulated, to determine power supply requirements or charge station requirements for candidate charge sites. Feasibility of implementing battery powered vehicles is assessed.