Flight Deck System Automating Approach Minima Determination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft operations require manual adjustment of visibility and ceiling minima during instrument approaches, which is inefficient and increases the risk of operator error, potentially leading to regulatory violations or collisions with terrain.

Innovation Solution

A flight deck system with a graphical interface and processor that receives aircraft conditions and compares them to electronic representations of charts to automatically determine and display applicable minima, reducing manual data entry and enhancing automation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual adjustment of visibility and ceiling minima is performed during instrument approaches, then operators can control the minima values, but the process becomes inefficient and increases the risk of operator error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk of operator errorVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines and displays applicable approach minima by comparing aircraft conditions with chart criteria without requiring manual pilot input. The flight deck system retrieves aircraft state information, identifies relevant approach charts, and computes minima values autonomously, eliminating the manual adjustment process while maintaining accuracy and improving efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of adjusting minima values with an automated electronic system. The flight deck system uses computer processing to compare aircraft conditions with chart criteria and automatically determines applicable minima, substituting human manual operations with automated electronic computation and display

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If manual adjustment of approach minima is required, then operators can customize minima values, but this increases the complexity of the operation and potential for regulatory violations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of minima adjustmentVSAvoidcomplexity of minima adjustment process
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic determination of approach minima by comparing aircraft conditions with chart criteria, eliminating the need for manual adjustment operations. The flight deck system autonomously retrieves necessary data, performs comparisons, and displays the applicable minima, making the process easier while reducing complexity through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-loads approach chart data and criteria into the flight deck system before the approach procedure begins. By having the data ready and pre-processed, the system can quickly determine applicable minima without requiring complex manual lookups or adjustments during the critical approach phase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If automated determination of approach minima is implemented, then operational efficiency is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flight deck system integrates multiple functions into a single automated minima determination system. It combines aircraft state monitoring, chart data retrieval, criteria comparison, and minima display functions, allowing the system to perform all these operations through a unified automated process that improves efficiency without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a flight deck system as an intermediary between the aircraft operations and the approach minima determination process. This intermediary system handles the complex comparisons and data processing automatically, shielding the pilots from complexity while maintaining high operational efficiency through automated computation and display

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11450213B2Flight deck system for determining approach minima
Publication Date: 2022.09.20 GARMIN INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US11450213B2 patent drawing
  • US11450213B2 patent drawing
  • US11450213B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flight deck system for an aircraft includes a processor, a graphical interface for displaying flight-related information in the form of selectable items, a control interface for receiving a selection of the selectable items, and a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium for storing electronic representations of charts. The selectable items correspond to the electronic representations of charts, and the electronic representations of charts describe minima and associated conditional criteria for operating the aircraft (e.g., proximate to an airport). The processor is configured to arrange the selectable items, receive a selection of the selectable items, identify a corresponding one of the electronic representations of charts, receive a condition associated with the aircraft, compare the condition to the conditional criteria for operating the aircraft to identify an applicable one of the plurality of minima, and display the applicable one of the plurality of minima on the graphical interface.