Unified Flight Hand Controller With Obstacle Feedback Cues

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current control systems for Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) and piloted aircraft lack a unified, efficient method to control motion in multiple degrees of freedom and provide effective feedback for obstacle detection, leading to potential collisions and complex control interfaces.

Innovation Solution

A unified hand controller system that allows control of motion in multiple degrees of freedom, including rotational and translational movements, with integrated feedback mechanisms using vibration and visual cues to alert pilots of obstacles, enabling safer and more intuitive flight control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a unified hand controller system is implemented to control motion in multiple degrees of freedom, then control precision and ease of operation are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol interface simplicityVSAvoidcontroller system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple control functions (rotational control, translational control, obstacle detection feedback) into a single unified hand controller interface. This merging of previously separate control systems into one integrated device simplifies the operator interface while managing the inherent complexity through unified design architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The hand controller is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: controlling rotational motion, controlling translational motion, and receiving obstacle detection feedback. This multi-functional design allows a single device to replace multiple specialized controls, improving ease of operation while the internal architecture manages the complexity through functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If integrated feedback mechanisms are added to alert pilots of obstacles, then safety and reliability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance capabilityVSAvoidfeedback system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates obstacle detection sensors that provide real-time feedback to the pilot through the hand controller interface. This feedback mechanism alerts pilots of obstacles in the flight path, enabling timely corrective actions. The feedback loop integrates sensing, processing, and notification functions that improve reliability while the integrated architecture manages complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The hand controller serves as an intermediary device that not only transmits pilot commands to the aircraft but also relays obstacle detection information back to the pilot. This dual-function intermediary role consolidates control and feedback pathways through a single interface, improving safety while managing system complexity through centralized communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If real-time obstacle detection and feedback are implemented, then safety is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time obstacle detectionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The obstacle detection system operates by periodically scanning the environment and providing feedback to the pilot. Rather than continuous monitoring at maximum intensity, the system uses periodic detection cycles that maintain safety while reducing overall energy consumption compared to constant high-power operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enhances control precision and safety by allowing seamless control of UAS and piloted aircraft in complex environments while providing real-time obstacle detection and feedback, reducing the risk of collisions and improving pilot experience.

Implementation Method 1

The controller may include one or more vibration haptic motors configured to vibrate in response to the signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS11599107B2Apparatus, methods and systems for remote or onboard control of flights
Publication Date: 2023.03.07 FLUIDITY TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11599107B2 patent drawing
  • US11599107B2 patent drawing
  • US11599107B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates generally to control systems, and in particular apparatus, methods, and systems for controlling flights remotely or onboard the vehicle. More specifically, the present disclosure describes embodiments of a control system that allows a user to control the motion of a control target in or along one or more degrees of freedom using a single controller.