Robot with obstacle-detecting deformation sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing floor cleaning robots rely on perimeter bumpers and associated switches for obstacle detection, which require a large standoff distance, limiting the placement of agitators close to the leading surface, thus reducing edge cleaning efficiency and increasing packaging space and weight.

Innovation Solution

The use of deformation-based obstacle detection circuits, such as strain gauges, to measure deflection or deformation of the robot's body, allowing for the placement of agitators within 5 mm of the leading surface without perimeter bumpers, enabling efficient edge cleaning and reducing weight and packaging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional perimeter bumpers with switches are used for obstacle detection, then obstacle detection is achieved, but the standoff distance between the bumper and the body's leading surface increases, reducing cleaning space and edge cleaning effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detectionVSAvoidstandoff distance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the obstacle detection function from the traditional perimeter bumper assembly and relocates it to strain gauges mounted directly on the robot's body. This separation eliminates the need for the bumper structure and its associated switches, allowing the agitator to be positioned much closer to the leading surface while maintaining obstacle detection capability through direct body deformation sensing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If traditional perimeter bumpers with switches are used for obstacle detection, then obstacle detection is achieved, but the robot's weight and packaging space increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detectionVSAvoidrobot weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the entire perimeter bumper assembly including switches, levers, and mounting structures from the robot design. The obstacle detection function is extracted and implemented using only strain gauges mounted on the body, dramatically reducing the weight and packaging space required for obstacle detection components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical switch-based obstacle detection system with an electrical sensing system using strain gauges. This substitution eliminates heavy mechanical components like bumpers, levers, and switch mechanisms, achieving obstacle detection through measurement of body deformation via electrical signals from the strain gauges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If traditional perimeter bumpers with switches are used for obstacle detection, then obstacle detection is achieved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detectionVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the obstacle detection function from the complex mechanical bumper-switch system and implements it using simple strain gauges that directly measure body deformation. This extraction eliminates the need for mechanical linkages, levers, and switch mechanisms, significantly simplifying the detection system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the complex mechanical switch system with an electrical sensing approach using strain gauges. This substitution eliminates mechanical linkages, levers, and multiple moving parts, achieving obstacle detection through direct measurement of body deformation via electrical signals, thereby reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances edge cleaning efficiency by allowing agitators to be positioned closer to the leading surface, reducing packaging space and weight, while maintaining effective obstacle detection without traditional bumpers.

Implementation Method 1

the deformation sensor, e.g., a strain gauge or a plurality thereof, is connected to the body and configured to measure deflection or deformation value of the body when the body contacts an obstacle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStrain measurement: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS12490876B2Robot with obstacle-detecting deformation sensors
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 BISSELL INC
  • US12490876B2 patent drawing
  • US12490876B2 patent drawing
  • US12490876B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot such as a floor cleaning robot includes a body, a motorized drive system connected to the body and operable for moving the robot relative to a floor surface, at least one deformation sensor, and a controller. Each deformation sensor may be a strain sensor, such as a strain gauge, and is connected to the body and configured to measure a deformation thereof, and to output an electronic signal indicative of the deformation. The controller detects a threshold deformation of the body indicative of contact with an obstacle by processing the electronic signal, and thereafter modifies a dynamic state of the robot via regulation of the motorized drive system in response to the threshold deformation.