Flow Adjusters for Dynamic Coolant Impedance Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cooling systems for heat-generating electronic devices lack dynamic control over coolant flow, failing to account for variable heat dissipation patterns and thermal resistances across different components, leading to inefficient heat management and potential damage from temperature cycling.

Innovation Solution

Implementing multiple independently controllable flow adjusters within the device that can dynamically alter coolant flow impedance in response to temperature changes, allowing for localized temperature control and tailored cooling solutions for different components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a same active cooling source is used to flow coolant through a group of servers, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to different cooling needs of individual servers deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling system complexityVSAvoidadaptability to varying cooling needs
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the cooling system into segmented units by placing individual flow adjusters in each server's coolant channel. Each flow adjuster can independently control flow impedance for its respective server, allowing tailored cooling without requiring separate cooling sources for each server. This segmentation enables localized flow control while maintaining a shared cooling infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by enabling each server to have customized flow impedance characteristics through its dedicated flow adjuster. Each component can be configured with different flow resistance values matched to its specific thermal requirements, allowing optimal cooling performance for each server's unique heat generation pattern while using a common cooling source.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If coolant flow is uniformly distributed across all channels, then device complexity is minimized, but manufacturing precision of temperature control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control mechanism complexityVSAvoidtemperature control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by allowing each flow adjuster to independently modify flow impedance parameters according to the specific thermal requirements of different servers or components. Each adjuster can be configured with different resistance values to optimize coolant flow distribution, enabling precise temperature control without complex active control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If actively controlled cooling systems are used with multiple flow adjusters, then adaptability to different cooling needs is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocalized flow control capabilityVSAvoidnumber of flow control components
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by designing flow adjusters that can be passively configured based on predetermined thermal requirements. The flow impedance settings can be established during manufacturing or installation without requiring active control systems, sensors, or power consumption. Each flow adjustor independently regulates its own channel's flow based on its configured parameters, eliminating the need for complex centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables more efficient heat removal from hotspots, extends component lifespan by maintaining optimal temperatures, and allows for uniform cooling systems to accommodate varying cooling needs across different servers, reducing complexity and costs in data centers.

Implementation Method 1

selectively altering a first flow impedance within a first channel of the electronic device by changing a physical configuration of a first flow adjuster positioned in-line with the first channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow impedance:

Implementation Method 2

a passively-controlled cooling system typically does not include a fan or coolant pump and is instead driven by natural conduction and/or convection processes that dissipate heat to a target heat outlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

a passively-controlled cooling system typically does not include a fan or coolant pump and is instead driven by natural conduction and/or convection processes that dissipate heat to a target heat outlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal convection: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS20240373589A1Flow management in a heat-generating device
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US20240373589A1 patent drawing
  • US20240373589A1 patent drawing
  • US20240373589A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A device cooling system includes a first flow adjuster positioned in-line with a first channel and a second flow adjuster positioned in-line with a second channel. The first flow adjuster is configurable to selectively adjust a first flow impedance within the first channel and the second flow adjuster is configurable to selectively adjust a second flow impedance within the second channel. The first flow impedance is independently adjustable relative to the second flow impedance.