Foldable Light Strip Structure for On-Site Beam Shaping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flexible light strips and sheets face challenges with mechanical rigidity, predefined sizes leading to transportation inconvenience, visible joints, and limited design freedom due to fixed appearance and light emission patterns, requiring additional mechanical support during installation.

Innovation Solution

A foldable light generating device with domains separated by fold lines and adhesive layers that allow for flexible installation, customizable beam shaping, and easy transportation, featuring a support structure that can be adjusted on-site for mechanical stability and optical functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If flexible light strips are used, then ease of installation and storage are improved, but mechanical rigidity deteriorates requiring additional support structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of installationVSAvoidmechanical rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is nested within the adhesive layer system. The adhesive layers are applied to different domain sides, and when domains are folded atop one another, the support structure is enclosed within this nested configuration, providing mechanical rigidity while maintaining the flexible, foldable nature of the light strip.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a flexible support structure composed of multiple thin domains separated by fold lines. These thin film-like domains can be folded and bent easily for installation, yet when configured together with adhesive layers, they provide sufficient mechanical support without requiring additional rigid profiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

2Strength

If additional extruded profiles are added for mechanical support, then mechanical rigidity is improved, but device complexity and transportation convenience deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical rigidityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is merged with the adhesive layer system and domain configuration. Instead of adding separate extruded profiles, the patent combines the support function with the existing domains and adhesive layers, eliminating the need for additional components and reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The domains and adhesive layers serve multiple functions simultaneously: they provide mechanical support, enable folding and flexibility, facilitate installation through adhesion, and allow for configurational changes. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate dedicated support profiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If predefined sized profiles are used, then manufacturing is simplified, but transportation convenience and customization flexibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidcustomization flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is designed to be dynamic and reconfigurable through fold lines that allow domains to be folded to different angles. This enables the same manufactured structure to adapt to various installation configurations and customization requirements without requiring different predefined sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure is segmented into multiple domains separated by fold lines. This segmentation allows the structure to be manufactured in standard units while providing flexibility through folding, enabling customization without requiring custom manufacturing for each application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of manufacture

If fixed appearance and light emission patterns are used, then manufacturing is simplified, but design freedom and glare control deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoiddesign freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The light emission pattern is made dynamic through the foldable domain structure. By folding domains to different angles, the light emission direction and pattern can be adjusted on-site, providing design freedom and glare control while maintaining simple manufacturing of the underlying structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4229328B1Foldable light generating device
Publication Date: 2026.03.04 SIGNIFY HOLDING BV
  • EP4229328B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1C
  • EP4229328B1 patent drawingFigure 1D(I)~2
  • EP4229328B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

The invention provides a light generating device (1000) comprising s1 light sources (100) and a support (200) configured to support the s1 light sources (100), wherein the s1 light sources (100) are configured to generate light source light (101), wherein s1> 1 and wherein: (a) the support (200) comprises n1 domains (210), wherein n1>3, wherein the support (200) comprises k1 fold lines (220), wherein k1>2, wherein at least three of the n1 domains (210) are separated by at least two of the k1 fold lines (220); wherein the domains (210) have a first domain side (211) and a second domain side (212); (b) the at least three of the n1 domains (210) and the at least two of the k1 fold lines (220) are configured parallel; and (c) the light generating device (1000) comprises m1 adhesive layers (400), wherein m1>2; and wherein at least two of the m1 adhesive layers (400) are functionally coupled to different domain sides (211,212) of one or more domains (210).