Forged Iron Golf Club Head Cavities via Multi-Stage Forging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for manufacturing forged iron golf club heads with cavities are limited in achieving complex geometries quickly and cheaply, as existing techniques are either expensive and time-consuming or restrict the achievable geometries.

Innovation Solution

A multi-stage forging process involving rough forging, hot pressing, and precision forging to create a deep undercut cavity within a single solid billet, allowing for the formation of a forged golf club head with a cavity, and the option to attach an insert within the cavity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional forging techniques are used to create an iron golf club head, then production cost and time are reduced, but the ability to create complex cavity geometries is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction cost and timeVSAvoidcavity geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The forging process is divided into multiple stages: initial forging to create a blank, then subsequent forging operations to form the cavity. This segmentation allows complex geometries to be achieved through sequential shaping operations rather than requiring a single complex die, thus maintaining cost-effectiveness while achieving geometric complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An initial forging stage creates a prepared blank with preliminary shape characteristics before the final cavity-forming operations. This preliminary action simplifies subsequent forging steps by pre-positioning material flow paths and reducing the complexity of the final forming operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Shape

If milling techniques are used to create club heads with cavities from a single block, then complex geometries are achieved, but production cost and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecavity geometryVSAvoidproduction cost and time
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the milling process (subtractive manufacturing) with a forging process (formative manufacturing). Instead of removing material to create cavities, the material is shaped and formed through controlled deformation, achieving similar geometric complexity with lower cost and higher material efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the fundamental manufacturing parameter from material removal (milling) to material deformation (forging). This parameter change enables the creation of complex cavity geometries through plastic flow and forming operations, which are more cost-effective and time-efficient than subtractive processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Shape

If casting or co-casting methods are used to achieve advanced cavity geometries, then complex shapes are obtained, but material density and grain structure are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecavity geometryVSAvoidmaterial density and grain structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces casting methods with forging processes. Forging maintains the material's metallic structure and grain integrity through controlled plastic deformation, whereas casting creates potential defects like porosity and weak grain structures. This substitution achieves complex geometries while preserving superior material properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention effectively creates a composite structure where the forged metal body maintains its superior grain structure and density, while the cavity geometry provides the desired performance characteristics. The integration of complex cavity shapes within a densely-grained forged structure achieves both geometric complexity and material integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables the production of durable, high-performance golf club heads with a tighter grain structure, improved durability, and reduced production costs, while maintaining or enhancing ball speed, workability, spin rates, and feel characteristics compared to casted club heads.

Implementation Method 1

rough forging a solid block billet to create an intermediate club head body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy input: Heating

Implementation Method 2

hot pressing the intermediate club head to create a cavity in the body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical compression: Compression

Implementation Method 3

precision forging the intermediate club head to create a golf club body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy input: Heating

Data Source

PatentEP3852887B1Multi-stage forging process
Publication Date: 2023.06.07 KARSTEN MFG CORP
  • EP3852887B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3852887B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3852887B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method of manufacturing an iron type golf club head with a cavity. Other embodiments are disclosed.