Forged Iron Club Head Cavity Forming for Lower CG and Higher MOI

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for manufacturing forged iron golf club heads with cavities are expensive and time-consuming, and they struggle to achieve advanced geometries and mass properties efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A multi-stage forging process that forms a forged iron golf club head with a rear cavity from a single billet, using a bent strike face technique to create a deep undercut cavity, and incorporating an elastomeric insert to optimize mass distribution and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional forging techniques are used to create an iron golf club head, then the manufacturing cost is reduced and production time is shortened, but the ability to create cavities and advanced geometries is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing cost and production timeVSAvoidability to create cavities and advanced geometries
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The forging process is divided into multiple stages: initial forging to create the basic club head shape, followed by a second forging operation to create the cavity. This segmentation allows each stage to optimize for its specific function, achieving both cost efficiency and geometric complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first forging operation preliminarily forms the club head body with prepared geometry before the second forging operation creates the final cavity shape. This preliminary action enables the subsequent cavity formation to be more efficient and precise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If casting or co-casting methods are used to create club heads with cavities, then advanced geometries and cavity designs can be achieved, but the manufacturing cost increases and production time extends

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvanced geometries and cavity designsVSAvoidmanufacturing cost and production time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the chemical casting process with a mechanical forging process to create cavities. The second forging operation uses mechanical force to displace material and form the cavity, eliminating the need for casting molds and chemical processes while achieving similar geometric results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the forging process, including applying controlled displacement and force during the second forging operation to create the cavity. By adjusting forging parameters such as pressure, temperature, and tooling geometry, the desired cavity shapes are achieved through mechanical means rather than casting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If milling techniques are used to create club heads with cavities from a single block of material, then the desired geometries can be achieved, but the process becomes expensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesired geometries from single blockVSAvoidproduction speed and cost efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the subtractive milling process with a formative forging process. Instead of removing material to create cavities, the second forging operation shapes the material directly into the desired cavity geometry, significantly reducing production time and material waste while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the plastic phase transition of metal during forging to transform the solid billet into the final club head shape with cavities. The heat treatment and forging processes exploit the ductile phase of metal to enable complex shape changes that would be inefficient through milling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process results in a forged iron club head with a lower center of gravity and higher moment of inertia, providing improved performance and feel similar to casted cavity back club heads, while maintaining the benefits of forging such as a tighter grain structure.

Implementation Method 1

incorporating an elastomeric insert to optimize mass distribution and performance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20250161768A1Multi-stage forging process
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 KARSTEN MFG CORP
  • US20250161768A1 patent drawing
  • US20250161768A1 patent drawing
  • US20250161768A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An iron-type golf club head with a cavity formed via a multi-stage forging process. The forged iron-type golf club head is formed from a single billet of material. An intermediate step of the multi-stage forging process creates a cavity in the iron-type golf club head which can receive an insert. The resultant iron-type golf club head has a substantially lower center of gravity and higher moment of inertia when compared to a traditionally forged iron-type golf club head lacking a cavity. Additionally, the resultant iron-type golf club head has a more solid feel than a traditionally cast iron-type golf club head as a result of the tighter grain structure the forging process yields.