Fork for an operating element in an air outlet, operating element for an air outlet, and method for fastening an operating element

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing air outlet operating elements face issues with plastic deformation during mounting, leading to reduced misuse force absorption, noise, and risk of unintentional detachment due to high mounting forces and material prestress changes.

Innovation Solution

A fork with compressible spring arms between bearing journals, allowing for elastic prestressing and targeted force distribution to prevent plastic deformation and ensure play-free mounting, while the spring arms' stops limit deformation and secure the fork's position.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the fork is mounted rigidly into the operating part, then the structural stability is improved, but the mounting forces become excessively high causing plastic deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidmisuse force absorption
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the mechanical parameter of the fork from rigid to elastic by introducing a spring element, allowing the fork to deform elastically during mounting and operation. This eliminates plastic deformation while maintaining structural stability through the spring's restoring force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The fork transitions from a static rigid structure to a dynamic elastic structure that can adapt its stiffness during mounting and operation. The spring element allows the fork to flex during installation and return to its original position, absorbing mounting forces without permanent deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If the bearing overlaps are reduced to minimize mounting forces, then the plastic deformation is reduced, but the force absorption capability and detachment risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to plastic deformationVSAvoidfork detachment resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the mechanical parameter of the fork from rigid to elastic by introducing a spring element, allowing the fork to deform elastically during mounting and operation. This eliminates plastic deformation while maintaining structural stability through the spring's restoring force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If the fork and operating part are made very stable with rigid configuration, then the misuse force absorption is improved, but the mounting forces become excessively high causing deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemisuse force absorptionVSAvoidfork shape stability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The fork transitions from a static rigid structure to a dynamic elastic structure that can adapt its stiffness during mounting and operation. The spring element allows the fork to flex during installation and return to its original position, absorbing mounting forces without permanent deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Stability of the object's composition

If high mounting forces are applied to ensure secure fastening, then the initial mounting stability is improved, but the components move freely after mounting due to prestress loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting stabilityVSAvoidoperational stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The spring element is pre-compressed during mounting to store elastic energy, creating an initial prestress that secures the fork in place. This preliminary action ensures both secure mounting and continued operational stability without requiring excessively high mounting forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The fork can absorb high misuse forces without plastic deformation, reduces noise, and ensures secure mounting and operation by utilizing the spring arms' elastic properties to maintain prestress and prevent relative movement between components.

Implementation Method 1

The at least one spring arm is compressible to reduce the spacing between the first and second ends

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The at least one spring arm is compressible to reduce the spacing between the first and second ends

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS10960728B2Fork for an operating element in an air outlet, operating element for an air outlet, and method for fastening an operating element
Publication Date: 2021.03.30 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US10960728B2 patent drawing
  • US10960728B2 patent drawing
  • US10960728B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fork (10) for an operating element in an air outlet has a first bearing journal (14) at a first end (12) and a second bearing journal (18) at a second end (16). At least one spring arm (22, 24) is provided between the first bearing journal (14) and the second bearing journal (18), it being possible for the spacing of the outer ends (12, 16) of the bearing journals (14, 18) to be reduced by way of said at least one spring arm (22, 24). Furthermore, an operating element and a method for fastening an operating element are provided.