Free-Hanging Microchannel for High Flowrate MEMS Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing microelectromechanical system (MEMS) components manufactured using Surface Channel Technology (SCT) are limited in achieving higher flowrates while maintaining low volumes and low pressure drop, which is necessary for applications like liquid chromatography and "Lab-on-a-Chip".

Innovation Solution

The development of a microelectromechanical system component with a free-hanging or free-standing microchannel having a substantially circular cross-section, where the channel diameter is significantly larger than the channel wall thickness, allowing for increased flow range and reduced pressure sensitivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If Surface Channel Technology (SCT) is used to manufacture MEMS components, then the channel can be freely shaped with precise manufacturing control, but the channel diameter is limited to around 300 μm and higher flowrates cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel shape controlVSAvoidchannel diameter
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from surface-level channel creation (2D SCT) to bulk substrate etching (3D approach), allowing channels to extend through the entire substrate thickness. This dimensional change enables much larger channel diameters (up to 1 mm or more) while maintaining manufacturing precision through controlled etching processes from both front and back sides of the substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing process is divided into multiple stages: front side etching, back side etching, and selective removal of sacrificial layers. This segmentation allows independent control of channel dimensions and wall thickness, enabling large diameters while maintaining precise geometric control through separate etching steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If the channel diameter is increased to achieve higher flowrates, then the flow range improves, but the pressure drop increases and the channel wall becomes thinner

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflowrateVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

By etching channels through the bulk substrate rather than creating surface channels, the patent achieves larger diameters that reduce flow resistance and pressure drop. The three-dimensional etching approach allows optimal diameter selection for high flowrate applications while maintaining adequate wall thickness through controlled etching depths from both substrate sides.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental manufacturing parameter from surface etching depth to bulk etching through the entire substrate. This parameter change enables channel diameters an order of magnitude larger than SCT, directly reducing pressure drop according to the Hagen-Poiseuille equation, while wall thickness is controlled by the etching process parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the channel diameter is increased, then higher flowrates are possible, but the channel wall thickness becomes insufficient and structural stability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflowrateVSAvoidchannel wall thickness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The etching process is segmented into front-side and back-side operations with a sacrificial layer in between. This allows the channel to be formed as a through-substrate structure with walls defined by the substrate material itself, providing inherent structural strength. The wall thickness is determined by the substrate thickness and etching control, decoupled from the channel diameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the substrate material (typically silicon or other MEMS-compatible materials) as both the structural support and the channel wall material. This composite approach, where the substrate provides mechanical strength and the etched channels provide fluid transport, enables large diameter channels with adequate wall thickness for structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Volume of stationary object

If Surface Channel Technology is used, then low-volume microfluidic flowmeters can be manufactured, but the pressure sensitivity increases and low pressure drop cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice volumeVSAvoidpressure sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The transition from surface channels to bulk channels creates larger diameter flow paths that significantly reduce pressure drop. The bulk etching approach allows channels to occupy the full substrate thickness, maximizing hydraulic diameter while maintaining compact device footprint, thereby reducing pressure sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Changing the channel formation from surface-level to bulk-through changes the hydraulic geometry parameters. The larger effective diameter and reduced flow path length through the substrate directly reduce pressure drop according to fluid dynamics principles, while the device remains compact due to the thin substrate configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12234143B2Microelectromechanical system component or a microfluidic component comprising a free-hanging or free-standing microchannel
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 BERKIN
  • US12234143B2 patent drawing
  • US12234143B2 patent drawing
  • US12234143B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) component or microfluidic component comprising a free-hanging or free-standing microchannel (1), as well as methods for manufacturing such a microchannel, as well as a flow sensor, e.g. a thermal flow sensor or a Coriolis flow sensor, pressure sensor or multi-parameter sensor, valve, pump or microheater, comprising such a microelectromechanical system component or microfluidic component. The MEMS component allows to increase the flow range and/or decrease the pressure drop of for instance a micro Coriolis mass flow meter by increasing the channel diameter, while maintaining its advantages.