Time-Based Safe Mode for Freecooling Chiller Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-mode chiller systems in data centers face inefficiencies due to reliance on temperature sensors, which can fail, causing them to default to less efficient direct refrigeration even when freecooling conditions are suitable, leading to increased energy and water consumption.

Innovation Solution

A controller device that monitors ambient and return water temperatures to determine threshold conditions for engaging freecooling, and switches to a time-based safe mode if sensors fail, allowing the system to alternate between direct refrigeration and freecooling based on user-configured parameters, ensuring continuous efficient operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If the chiller system relies on temperature sensors to determine when to switch to freecooling mode, then energy efficiency is improved, but system reliability deteriorates when sensors fail

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring time-based safe mode parameters before sensor failure occurs. When sensor failure is detected, the controller immediately switches to time-based safe mode using pre-set configuration parameters, ensuring continuous operation without waiting for sensor repair. This preliminary preparation resolves the contradiction by providing a reliable fallback mechanism that maintains energy efficiency goals even when sensors fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary between the temperature sensors and the cooling system operation. It monitors sensor status and mediates the transition between sensor-based control and time-based safe mode. This intermediary function ensures that system reliability is maintained by detecting sensor failures and automatically switching to alternative control mechanisms, while still pursuing energy efficiency through freecooling when conditions permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the chiller system defaults to direct refrigeration when sensor failure occurs, then system reliability is maintained, but energy efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by making the control mode adjustable based on real-time conditions. Instead of a static default to direct refrigeration, the controller dynamically switches between sensor-based freecooling control and time-based safe mode, and can modulate the balance between freecooling and direct refrigeration based on ambient temperature conditions. This dynamic approach maintains reliability through safe mode while optimizing energy efficiency by utilizing freecooling when ambient temperatures are favorable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by switching from sensor-based temperature threshold control to time-based configuration parameter control. In time-based safe mode, the controller uses pre-configured time parameters to determine when to engage freecooling versus direct refrigeration. This parameter change allows the system to maintain reliability through structured fallback behavior while preserving energy efficiency by still attempting freecooling operation when conditions permit, rather than defaulting entirely to less efficient direct refrigeration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the chiller system uses temperature sensors to detect freecooling conditions, then cooling efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases due to sensor monitoring requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the essential control function from the temperature sensors themselves. Instead of relying solely on sensor-based temperature threshold comparison, the controller separates the sensing function from the decision-making function. In time-based safe mode, the controller uses time-based configuration parameters rather than continuous temperature sensor data to make cooling decisions. This extraction reduces the complexity of sensor monitoring while maintaining cooling efficiency through alternative means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies self-service by having the controller monitor its own operational status and automatically switch to safe mode when sensor failures are detected. The controller serves its own diagnostic and protective functions, eliminating the need for additional complex monitoring systems. This self-service approach maintains cooling efficiency by automatically adapting to sensor failures without requiring external intervention or complex additional hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables the chiller system to maintain energy efficiency and reduce water consumption by automatically switching to freecooling when conditions are favorable, even if temperature sensors fail, thereby preserving uninterrupted cooling functionality.

Implementation Method 1

air is driven (e.g., by fans) through the coil to transfer heat from the air to the chilled water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

air is driven (e.g., by fans) through the coil to transfer heat from the air to the chilled water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

the FC directs ambient air over the water loop via a fan, without mechanical refrigeration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced convection: Forced Convection

Implementation Method 4

the DX system may be the default chiller subsystem, cooling the water loop via a full refrigeration cycle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefrigeration cycle:

Data Source

PatentEP4475644A1Time-based energy efficient safe mode for freecooling unit
Publication Date: 2024.12.11 VERTIV CORP
  • EP4475644A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4475644A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4475644A1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

A system and method for time-based safe mode operation of a multi-mode chiller device incorporating a freecooling system and a direct refrigeration system (e.g., wherein a fluid loop is circulated between the chiller device and a data center or similarly sensitive environment, from which the chilled water transfers heat before returning to the chiller device) senses ambient air temperatures outside the data center environment and return water (RW) temperatures (e.g., of water returning to the chiller from the environment) and engages the freecooling system based on a difference or delta between ambient and RW temperatures. If either the RW or ambient temperature sensors fail, preventing the freecooling system from engaging automatically, time-based safe mode is engaged wherein the freecooling and direct refrigeration systems are alternately engaged according to configuration time parameters adjustable by a user.