Digital Fringe Projection Height Error Model

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital fringe projection (DFP) systems for additive manufacturing lack effective methods to quantify and manage measurement uncertainties, particularly due to noise sources like light projector gamma nonlinearity, quantization effects, and pixel intensity noise.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize a processor to capture images of an object's surface, generate pixel intensity data, and determine height error data based on a noise model, allowing for the assessment of measurement uncertainties and decision-making regarding additive manufacturing processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If digital fringe projection is used for surface measurement, then non-contact measurement capability is achieved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to noise sources like gamma nonlinearity, quantization effects, and pixel intensity noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-contact measurement capabilityVSAvoidheight measurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration to determine the height error model before actual measurements. This includes capturing reference images of known surfaces and calculating the relationship between pixel intensity errors and height measurement errors, so that correction can be applied during subsequent measurements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system calculates height error data based on the determined height error model and uses this feedback to assess whether measurements satisfy acceptance criteria. The error model provides continuous feedback about measurement reliability, enabling informed decisions about part acceptance or process adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If height measurements are performed without uncertainty quantification, then measurement speed is maintained, but reliability of measurement results deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement speedVSAvoidmeasurement result reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines height error data using the pre-established height error model without requiring manual uncertainty assessment. The model self-evaluates measurement reliability by comparing measured pixel intensities against the calibrated error relationships, enabling rapid automated reliability assessment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the measurement process by adding height error data as a new parameter alongside traditional height measurements. This allows simultaneous output of both measurement value and reliability metric, maintaining productivity while improving reliability assessment capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If noise sources like gamma nonlinearity and quantization effects are present, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidadditive manufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex hardware correction mechanisms with a software-based height error model. Instead of using additional calibration hardware or complex optical systems to eliminate noise effects, the invention uses computational methods to model and compensate for gamma nonlinearity, quantization effects, and pixel intensity noise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The height error model acts as an intermediary between the noisy measurement data and the final height measurements. It mediates the effect of noise sources by providing correction factors that translate raw pixel intensities into accurate height values, isolating the measurement system from the harmful effects of device imperfections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed solution enables accurate quantification of measurement uncertainties in DFP systems, improving the reliability of height measurements and enabling informed decisions in additive manufacturing, such as rejecting defective parts or adjusting process parameters.

Implementation Method 1

A light source projects structured light, such as a Moiré pattern or a fringe pattern, on to a surface of an object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight projection: Light

Implementation Method 2

An image sensor captures an image of the surface of the object and generates, from the captured image, pixel intensity data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS12287287B2Pore measurement device
Publication Date: 2025.04.29 RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
  • US12287287B2 patent drawing
  • US12287287B2 patent drawing
  • US12287287B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one aspect, there is provided a system including at least one processor, and at least one memory including program code which when executed by the at least one processor causes operations including capturing an image of at least a portion of a surface of an object; generating, from the captured image, pixel intensity data; in response to generating the pixel intensity data, determining, based on a height error model, height error data, wherein the height error data indicates an uncertainty of at least one height measurement of the object; and determining, based on the height error data, whether the object satisfies a threshold criteria for acceptance of the object. Related system, methods, and articles of manufacture are also disclosed.