Front-Wheel Differential Limiting for Brake Failure Redundancy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric brake devices with dual motor systems for redundancy increase component costs and complexity, while maintaining effective braking functionality.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control system with a differential device and a differential limiting mechanism, where a first electric brake mechanism and a second electric brake mechanism apply braking forces to respective drive wheels, and a controller assesses failures and required braking forces to adjust differential operation, allowing for redundancy without dual motor systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a dual motor system is provided for redundancy in the electric brake mechanism, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and component cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveredundancyVSAvoidcomponent cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the braking function across multiple wheels, with each wheel having its own electric brake mechanism. When one mechanism fails, the other wheels can still provide braking force, achieving redundancy without duplicating the entire motor system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The differential limiting mechanism serves multiple functions: it limits differential rotation during normal operation and also enables redistribution of braking force when a failure occurs, allowing a single system to handle both normal and failure conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If a dual motor system is provided for redundancy in the electric brake mechanism, then reliability is improved, but ease of manufacture deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveredundancyVSAvoidcomponent cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses multiple individual electric brake mechanisms at different wheels rather than duplicating entire motor assemblies, reducing manufacturing complexity and component costs while maintaining redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The differential limiting mechanism acts as an intermediary that coordinates between the electric brake mechanisms and the drive system, enabling failure compensation through differential control rather than requiring redundant motors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the differential limiting mechanism limits differential operation, then reliability is improved through failure compensation, but productivity may be affected due to additional control operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure compensationVSAvoidcontrol operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control portion continuously monitors the operational state of electric brake mechanisms and automatically adjusts differential limiting control when failures are detected, providing real-time feedback-based reliability compensation without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares the differential limiting mechanism in advance to compensate for potential failures, so when a failure occurs, the compensation action is already positioned to activate quickly, minimizing the impact on productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration secures redundancy in the electric brake system while controlling component costs and ensuring sufficient braking force, even in the event of failures, by coordinating the differential device and electric brake mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

The ball ramp mechanism converts the rotation of the motor into linear motion and transfers the linear motion to a piston

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBall ramp mechanism: Mechanical Advantage

Implementation Method 2

presses brake pads against a disc rotor to generate a braking force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11801849B2Vehicle control device, vehicle control method, and vehicle control system
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 ASTEMO LTD
  • US11801849B2 patent drawing
  • US11801849B2 patent drawing
  • US11801849B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electrically controlled differential gear is disposed between a right front wheel and a left front wheel of a vehicle. The electrically controlled differential gear includes a clutch mechanism that limits a differential operation of the electrically controlled differential gear. A second ECU (control portion) obtains information as to failure associated with actuation of a right front electric brake mechanism. The second ECU obtains a physical amount relating to a required braking force which is applied to the left front wheel and the right front wheel. The second ECU outputs a differential limiting control command for limiting the differential operation of the electrically controlled differential gear to the clutch mechanism (or more specifically, a differential ECU that controls the clutch mechanism) based on the information as to the failure and the physical amount relating to the required braking force.