Frequency-Shift Keying Command Transmission Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for transmitting command combinations via coded frequency-shift keying often result in errors and inefficient frequency usage, leading to spurious initiations and wide frequency ranges, which can be disadvantageous for rapid and reliable communication.

Innovation Solution

A method where the first frequency to be transmitted in a frequency pair is chosen based on at least one other associated frequency pair during command changes, allowing for efficient use of a narrower frequency band and preventing undesirable command combinations, with the option to insert frequencies or pauses for increased transmission capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If frequency pairs are allocated to each command combination without selection rules, then all command combinations can be transmitted, but errors and spurious initiations occur due to ambiguous frequency sequences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission reliabilityVSAvoidfrequency allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the first frequency of the frequency pair dynamic rather than static. Instead of always transmitting frequencies in a fixed order (f1, f2), the system dynamically selects which frequency to transmit first based on the current command state and desired next command. This dynamic selection prevents ambiguous frequency sequences that could be misinterpreted as different command combinations, thereby eliminating spurious initiations while maintaining reliable transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If a wide frequency range is used to cover many command combinations, then more commands can be transmitted, but the frequency band becomes inefficiently used

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommand combination capacityVSAvoidfrequency band efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically changing the transmission order parameter (which frequency is transmitted first) rather than changing the frequency range. By altering the sequence parameter based on the current command state, the system can efficiently encode multiple command combinations within a limited frequency band. This approach increases command combination capacity without requiring a wider frequency range, thereby improving frequency band efficiency and reducing energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If pauses are inserted between command combinations to maintain sequence integrity, then transmission accuracy improves, but total transmission time increases considerably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommand sequence accuracyVSAvoidtransmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining frequency pair associations with commands and establishing selection rules before transmission begins. The system prepares the frequency selection logic in advance based on the current command state, so that the correct frequency sequence is automatically selected during transmission without requiring pauses or interruptions. This preliminary preparation ensures command sequence accuracy while maintaining continuous, rapid transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If frequency selection is based on previous frequency pairs, then transmission reliability improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunambiguous transmissionVSAvoidfrequency selection logic
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the frequency selection logic context-specific rather than globally complex. The selection rules are tailored to the local transmission state (current command and desired next command), applying simple, localized decision logic at each transmission step. This approach ensures unambiguous transmission through context-appropriate frequency selection without requiring a globally complex system, as each local decision is based on straightforward rules specific to the current transmission context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures reliable and unambiguous transmission of commands or command combinations, optimizing frequency usage and reducing errors, while allowing for a higher number of transmissions within a limited frequency band.

Implementation Method 1

Method and apparatus for transmission of command combinations by coded frequency-shift keying

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFrequency-shift keying: Phase Modulation

Data Source

PatentUS7944962B2Method and apparatus for transmission of command combinations by means of coded frequency-shift keying
Publication Date: 2011.05.17 HITACHI ENERGY LTD
  • US7944962B2 patent drawing
  • US7944962B2 patent drawing
  • US7944962B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is disclosed for transmission of commands or command combinations via a communication link by coded frequency-shift keying. Each command or command combination is associated with one frequency pair. When a command changes from a preceding command or command combination to a subsequent command or command combination, one frequency (which will be the first to be transmitted) in the frequency pair of the subsequent command or command combination is chosen as a function of at least one other associated frequency pair.