Full-Duplex Self-Interference Cancellation Using Kernel Subsets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in effectively canceling self-interference in full-duplex configurations, particularly due to nonlinear interference, which complicates signal processing and reduces communication efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a nonlinear interference cancellation (NLIC) procedure that utilizes a subset of kernels from a set of nonlinear candidate kernels corresponding to a nonlinear self-interference model to cancel self-interference in full-duplex communications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a complete nonlinear self-interference model with all candidate kernels is used for self-interference cancellation, then the cancellation accuracy is improved, but the computational complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-interference cancellation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complete set of nonlinear candidate kernels is segmented into multiple subsets, where each subset contains a portion of the candidate kernels. Instead of processing all kernels simultaneously, the system divides the computational task into smaller segments that can be handled more efficiently, reducing the overall computational complexity while maintaining adequate self-interference cancellation performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by using only a selected subset of candidate kernels rather than the complete set. This partial approach provides a practical compromise where sufficient self-interference cancellation is achieved without the excessive computational burden of processing all possible kernels, aligning with the principle of doing enough rather than everything.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If the number of coefficients to be estimated in the NLIC procedure is increased to improve cancellation accuracy, then the self-interference cancellation performance is improved, but the computational requirements and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-interference cancellation performanceVSAvoidcoefficient estimation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and selects only the most relevant candidate kernels from the complete set, removing unnecessary kernels that contribute minimally to self-interference cancellation performance. This extraction process reduces the number of coefficients that need to be estimated, thereby decreasing the computational requirements and processing time while maintaining adequate cancellation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of kernel selection by adjusting which candidate kernels are included in the subset and how many kernels are used. By modifying this parameter, the system can balance between cancellation performance and computational efficiency, reducing the number of coefficients to estimate without significantly degrading the self-interference cancellation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12621118B2Self-interference cancellation for full-duplex communication
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12621118B2 patent drawing
  • US12621118B2 patent drawing
  • US12621118B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. In some aspects, a network node may transmit a first signal in accordance with a full duplex configuration. The network node may receive a second signal comprising a communication and self-interference associated with the first signal, wherein receiving the second signal comprises cancelling the self-interference based at least in part on a nonlinear interference cancellation (NLIC) procedure associated with a subset of kernels of a set of nonlinear candidate kernels corresponding to a nonlinear self-interference model. Numerous other aspects are described.