Fuzzy Logic Control for CMP Topography via In-Situ Metrology

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional semiconductor manufacturing processes face challenges in accurately controlling post-chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) topography due to insufficient accounting for complex multi-variable interactions, leading to inefficiencies and yield losses from surface anomalies like dishing, which are difficult to manage with existing methods.

Innovation Solution

A system integrating in-situ chemical mechanical polishing with fuzzy logic control, utilizing metrology or profilometry data to dynamically adjust polishing processes, ensuring precise control of CMP to achieve desired post-processing topographies, thereby optimizing CMP processing efficiency and reducing yield losses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional CMP control methods are used, then the process is simple to operate, but the manufacturing precision of post-CMP topography deteriorates due to inability to account for complex multi-variable interactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepost-CMP topography controlVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by measuring actual post-CMP topography and comparing it to target specifications. The system uses metrology data to detect surface anomalies like dishing and feeds this information back to adjust CMP process parameters, creating a closed-loop control system that continuously improves topography control accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts multiple CMP process parameters including polish pressure, slurry flow rate, pad force, and rotation speed based on real-time measurements and predicted polish rates. By changing these parameters during the polishing process, the system adapts to varying conditions and maintains precise control over post-CMP topography.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If complex multi-variable models are developed to account for all CMP variables, then the manufacturing precision improves, but the device complexity and data maintenance requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolish rate prediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurements of wafer topography before CMP to establish baseline conditions. It also conducts preliminary polishing stages that prepare the surface for final precision polishing. By preparing data and conditions in advance, the system reduces the complexity needed for real-time modeling while maintaining high prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the CMP process into multiple stages with different control objectives. The first stage focuses on bulk material removal with coarser control, while the second stage focuses on fine topography control with precise control. This segmentation allows simpler models to be used in each stage rather than requiring one complex model to handle all process variables simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If conventional best-guess models are used, then the device complexity is low, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates leading to yield losses from surface anomalies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess yieldVSAvoidtopography control accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system measures actual post-CMP topography and uses this feedback to detect surface anomalies such as dishing, peaks, and valleys. By comparing measured results against target specifications and feeding this information back into the process control, the system identifies and corrects deviations that would otherwise cause yield losses, thereby improving both precision and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic control of the CMP process by continuously adjusting parameters based on real-time measurements and predicted polish rates. The system adapts its control strategy during the polishing process rather than relying on static predetermined parameters, enabling it to respond to varying conditions and maintain high precision that prevents yield losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides direct and dynamic control over CMP processing, enhancing the ability to manage CMP processes effectively, reducing surface anomalies and improving yield by using real-time metrology data to adjust polishing parameters, thus achieving optimal post-CMP topographies in a cost-effective and efficient manner.

Implementation Method 1

chemical mechanical planarization or polishing (CMP)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical mechanical polishing: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

Electrochemical deposition (ECD) is typically the only practical method to form a blanket layer of copper

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical deposition: Electrodeposition

Data Source

PatentUS7636611B2Fuzzy logic system for process control in chemical mechanical polishing
Publication Date: 2009.12.22 SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICON LLC
  • US7636611B2 patent drawing
  • US7636611B2 patent drawing
  • US7636611B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a versatile system for controlling chemical mechanical polishing in a semiconductor manufacturing process. The system of the present inventions utilizes an in-situ chemical mechanical polishing system, having some type of measurement or metrology function, to bulk polish a semiconductor wafer to a first target threshold. Once the first target has been reached, a fuzzy logic control function, communicatively coupled to the in-situ chemical mechanical polishing system, takes control of further polishing. Measurement data from the measurement function is processed by the fuzzy logic control function, which then adjusts additional polishing time for the polishing system to render a desired wafer topography.