Fuzzy Logic Traction Control for Electric Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing traction control systems for electric vehicles are inefficient as they rely on a single control technique for all operating scenarios, leading to suboptimal traction and increased power consumption due to unnecessary computing resource utilization.

Innovation Solution

A fuzzy-logic based traction control system that adaptively selects between different control techniques (least-quadratic-regulator, sliding mode controller, loop-shaping based controller, or model predictive controller) based on the vehicle's state and road conditions to optimize torque compensation for each wheel, improving traction and reducing power waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single control technique is used for all operating scenarios, then the system structure is simple, but the traction control efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system structureVSAvoidtraction control efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic control technique selection mechanism that adapts to different operating scenarios. The fuzzy logic controller continuously evaluates vehicle state and road conditions to select the most appropriate control technique (LQR, SMC, LSC, or MPC) in real-time, transforming the static single-technique system into a dynamic multi-technique system that optimizes traction control efficiency for each specific operating condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the control parameter (control technique selection) based on operating conditions. By using fuzzy logic to evaluate vehicle state and road condition parameters, the system dynamically adjusts which control technique is applied, thereby resolving the contradiction between system simplicity and control efficiency across varying operating scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If a single control technique is used for all scenarios, then the computing resource utilization is reduced, but the traction performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidtraction performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects control techniques based on actual operating needs rather than continuously using all techniques. The fuzzy logic controller evaluates current vehicle state and road conditions to activate only the most suitable control technique, reducing unnecessary computing resource utilization and power consumption while maintaining optimal traction performance for each specific scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs self-evaluation through fuzzy logic assessment of vehicle state and road conditions, automatically selecting the appropriate control technique without external intervention. This self-service mechanism ensures that computing resources are utilized efficiently by activating control techniques only when and where they are needed, thereby reducing power consumption while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If fuzzy logic based adaptive selection is implemented, then the traction control efficiency is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraction control efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fuzzy logic controller serves as an intermediary layer between the vehicle state sensors and the multiple control techniques. This intermediary evaluates operating conditions and mediates the selection of appropriate control techniques, thereby improving traction control efficiency without requiring direct complex interactions between all system components, thus managing device complexity effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The fuzzy logic-based selection mechanism provides a universal framework that can accommodate multiple control techniques (LQR, SMC, LSC, MPC) within a single system architecture. This multi-functional approach allows the system to handle diverse operating scenarios through a unified selection mechanism, improving overall traction control efficiency while avoiding the need for separate dedicated systems for each control technique.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Loss of energy

If fuzzy logic based adaptive selection is implemented, then the power consumption is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidcontrol system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fuzzy logic controller acts as an energy-efficient intermediary that intelligently selects control techniques based on actual needs. This mediation reduces unnecessary computing operations and power consumption while managing the complexity of having multiple control techniques available, as the fuzzy logic layer provides a systematic way to navigate the multi-technique architecture without requiring complex coordination mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11225232B2Fuzzy logic based traction control for electric vehicles
Publication Date: 2022.01.18 CHONGQING JINKANG POWERTRAIN NEW ENERGY CO LTD
  • US11225232B2 patent drawing
  • US11225232B2 patent drawing
  • US11225232B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Fuzzy-logic based traction control for electric vehicles is provided. The system detects a wheel slip ratio for each wheel. The system receives an input torque command. The system determines a slip error for each wheel based on the wheel slip ratio for each wheel and a target wheel slip ratio. The system, using the fuzzy-logic based control selection technique, selects a traction control technique from one of a least-quadratic-regulator, a sliding mode controller, a loop-shaping based controller, or a model predictive controller. The system generates a compensation torque value for each wheel. The system generates the compensation torque value based on the traction control technique selected via the fuzzy-logic based control selection technique and the slip error for each wheel. The system transmits commands to actuate drive units of the vehicles based on the compensation torque value.