Garnet Scintillator Material for X-ray Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current solid state scintillators used in X-ray CT apparatuses and security systems face challenges in achieving high sensitivity and reducing afterglow time while maintaining cost-effectiveness, with cadmium tungstate being environmentally hazardous and rare earth oxysulfide ceramics having limitations in cost and characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A solid state scintillator material with a garnet structure composition of (Gd1-α-β-γTbαLuβCeγ)3(Al1-xGax)aOb, where α, β, and γ are within specific atomic ratios, incorporating Gd, Tb, Lu, Ce, Al, and Ga to enhance X-ray absorption, light emission, and reduce afterglow, while minimizing impurities and hetero-phase precipitation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If monocrystalline cadmium tungstate is used as solid state scintillator, then cost is reduced, but environmental harm increases due to cadmium being a noxious substance

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidenvironmental harm
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive and environmentally hazardous monocrystalline cadmium tungstate with cost-effective polycrystalline rare earth oxide ceramics that have comparable or superior performance characteristics, eliminating the need for harmful cadmium while maintaining economic viability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite polycrystalline rare earth oxide ceramics containing multiple elements (Gd, Tb, Lu, Ce) in specific ratios to achieve the desired balance of performance, cost, and environmental compatibility, replacing single-material cadmium tungstate with a multi-component alternative

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If rare earth oxysulfide ceramics are used as solid state scintillator, then sensitivity is improved, but cost increases and afterglow time is not sufficiently reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesensitivityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the chemical composition parameters by using rare earth oxide ceramics with specific elemental ratios (Gd1-α-β-γTbαLuβCeγ) instead of traditional oxysulfide compositions, achieving improved sensitivity while controlling cost through optimized material formulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite rare earth oxide ceramics containing Gd, Tb, Lu, and Ce elements in controlled amounts to achieve superior sensitivity and shorter afterglow time compared to conventional materials, while maintaining cost-effectiveness through efficient use of rare earth elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Illumination intensity

If rare earth oxide ceramics with garnet structure are used as solid state scintillator, then light output is improved, but scan time cannot be sufficiently reduced due to insufficient sensitivity and afterglow time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight outputVSAvoidscan time
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the composition parameters of rare earth oxide ceramics by incorporating specific ratios of Gd, Tb, Lu, and Ce elements to simultaneously enhance light output and reduce afterglow time, enabling faster scanning while maintaining high sensitivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite rare earth oxide ceramics with optimized elemental composition to achieve both high light output for improved sensitivity and short afterglow time for reduced scan time, resolving the contradiction between these performance parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Object-affected harmful factors

If X-ray exposure dose is reduced to minimize radiation to subject, then sensitivity of scintillator must be increased to maintain image quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation doseVSAvoidsensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material composition parameters by using rare earth oxide ceramics with specific elemental ratios to increase X-ray absorption coefficient and improve sensitivity, enabling reduced exposure doses while maintaining adequate image quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite rare earth oxide ceramics with optimized composition to enhance X-ray absorption and sensitivity, allowing the system to detect lower radiation doses while maintaining image quality, thus reducing radiation exposure to the subject

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed scintillator material achieves high sensitivity, short afterglow time, and improved light output, enabling faster scanning and reduced X-ray exposure doses with enhanced cost-effectiveness and environmental sustainability.

Implementation Method 1

a solid state scintillator which emits visible light when excited by X-rays

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScintillation: Scintillation

Implementation Method 2

an X-ray detector in which plural X-ray detecting elements are arranged

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS8431042B2Solid state scintillator material, solid state scintillator, radiation detector, and radiation inspection apparatus
Publication Date: 2013.04.30 NITERRA MATERIALS CO LTD
  • US8431042B2 patent drawing
  • US8431042B2 patent drawing
  • US8431042B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an embodiment, a solid state scintillator material includes a composition represented by a general formula: (Gd1-α-β-γTBαLuβCeγ)3(Al1-xGax)aOb, where α and β are numbers satisfying 0<α≦0.5, 0<β≦0.5, and α+β≦0.85, γ is a number satisfying 0.0001≦γ≦0.1, x is a number satisfying 0<x<1, a is a number satisfying 4.8≦a≦5.2 and b is a number satisfying 11.6≦b≦12.4 (atomic ratio), and a garnet structure.