Inflatable Gas Bladder Shock Wave Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for mitigating shock waves from explosions, such as solid barriers, mechanical venting, chemical agents, aqueous foams, and solid foams, are either too heavy, bulky, toxic, or impractical for widespread use, especially in battlefield conditions and personal protection scenarios.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a gas with specific acoustic impedance less than air to fill a contained environment or uses a convex gas lens to deflect shock waves, utilizing ultraviolet and infrared detectors for explosion detection and inflatable bladders filled with low impedance gases like helium or argon to reduce overpressure and dissipate shock wave energy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If solid barriers are used to deflect and attenuate shock waves, then protection from shock effects is improved, but the structures become massive, immobile, expensive and time-consuming to erect

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from shock effectsVSAvoidmassive structures
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state of the protective material from solid to gas, specifically using helium or other low-density gases filled in inflatable bladders. This parameter change dramatically reduces weight while maintaining protective function through acoustic impedance mismatch with the shock wave

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs pneumatic principles by using gas-filled inflatable bladders instead of solid structures. The gas pressure and density properties are utilized to create an effective shock wave barrier that is lightweight and deployable, resolving the contradiction between protection effectiveness and structural mass

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Object-affected harmful factors

If blast mats are used for shock wave mitigation, then protection is provided, but they are heavy and bulky requiring large storage space and not easily moved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock wave mitigationVSAvoidstorage space
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the protective system from a static, bulky solid structure to a dynamic, inflatable gas-filled system. The bladders can be compressed to minimal volume for storage and then inflated rapidly when needed, providing shock wave mitigation without permanent bulk or weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes volume parameter dynamically - the gas-filled bladders occupy minimal space when deflated for storage, then expand to full protective volume when inflated. This parameter change resolves the contradiction between providing adequate protection volume and minimizing storage volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If mechanical venting is employed to mitigate blast overpressure, then overpressure release is achieved, but it requires facilities to be designed in advance and does not protect from blasts in open environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverpressure releaseVSAvoidfacility design requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gas-filled bladder system is self-contained and self-deploying. It requires no pre-designed facility infrastructure, no external power sources, and no complex installation. The system simply inflates and provides protection autonomously in any environment, resolving the complexity and design requirement issues of mechanical venting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Object-affected harmful factors

If chemical agents are used to suppress shock waves, then combustion process is interrupted, but they have toxic effects on humans at effective concentrations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion suppressionVSAvoidtoxic effects
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses an intermediary substance (inert gas like helium) that physically intervenes between the shock wave and the protected target. This intermediary absorbs and dissipates shock wave energy through acoustic impedance mismatch, providing protection without the toxic chemical effects of combustion-suppressing agents

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces peak overpressure by up to 61% within enclosed spaces and provides significant shock wave attenuation, making it suitable for various applications including vehicle and building protection, and personal body armor, with the added benefit of quick deployment and minimal storage requirements.

Implementation Method 1

releases a gas having specific acoustic impedance less than air into the substantially contained environment... the newly introduced gas reduces a peak overpressure that can occur in as a result of the shock wave

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic impedance: Acoustic Radiation Pressure

Implementation Method 2

interposes a convex gas lens between an explosion and the target to deflect, diffract, disburse or otherwise direct the shock wave away from the target

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Implementation Method 3

detects an explosion external to the contained environment using, for example, ultraviolet and/or infrared detectors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltraviolet detection: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 4

detects an explosion external to the contained environment using, for example, ultraviolet and/or infrared detectors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared detection: Infrared Radiation

Implementation Method 5

inflatable bladders filled with low impedance gases like helium or argon to reduce overpressure and dissipate shock wave energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression and expansion: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS7421936B2Systems and methods for explosive blast wave mitigation
Publication Date: 2008.09.09 RTX BBN TECH INC
  • US7421936B2 patent drawing
  • US7421936B2 patent drawing
  • US7421936B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention in various embodiments is directed to systems and methods for mitigating damage from a shock wave using a gas having a specific impedance less than air.