Gate Sizing Optimization Using Penalty Functions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing circuit synthesis approaches are computationally expensive and produce poor quality results due to the iterative trial-and-error method for determining optimal gate sizes, especially when dealing with large circuit designs and multiple process corners and modes.

Innovation Solution

A numerical solver, such as a conjugate-gradient based solver, is used to model and optimize gate sizes by selecting a portion of the circuit design, incorporating generic logical effort values and wire resistance and capacitance values, and constraining variables within a range of available gate capacitance values to optimize gate capacitance values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If iterative trial-and-error based circuit synthesis approaches are used to determine optimal gate sizes, then timing constraints can be checked across multiple process corners and modes, but the computational time becomes too long and the quality of results deteriorates for large circuit designs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming constraint satisfactionVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the approach from discrete iterative trial-and-error to continuous numerical optimization. By formulating gate sizing as a numerical optimization problem with continuous variables and using penalty functions to incorporate timing constraints, the method achieves faster computation while maintaining reliable timing constraint satisfaction across multiple process corners and modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If iterative trial-and-error based circuit synthesis approaches are used to determine optimal gate sizes, then timing constraints can be checked across multiple process corners and modes, but the quality of results becomes poor for large circuit designs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming constraint satisfactionVSAvoidquality of results
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the discrete iterative optimization into a continuous numerical optimization framework. By using penalty functions to incorporate timing constraints and solving a system of equations numerically, the method achieves both faster computation and higher quality results for large circuit designs, eliminating the trade-off between reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If gate capacitance values are constrained to discrete library values, then manufacturability is improved, but the optimization flexibility and solution quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemanufacturabilityVSAvoidoptimization flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the optimization process into two stages: first, continuous numerical optimization to determine optimal gate capacitance values and sizing relationships; second, mapping the continuous results to discrete library values. This segmentation allows the optimization to maintain full mathematical flexibility while ensuring manufacturability through the final discretization step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces penalty functions as intermediaries that bridge the continuous optimization domain and discrete library domain. The penalty functions incorporate timing constraints and guide the continuous optimization toward solutions that can be successfully mapped to discrete library values, maintaining both optimization flexibility and manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8826217B2Modeling gate size range by using a penalty function in a numerical gate sizing framework
Publication Date: 2014.09.02 SYNOPSYS INC
  • US8826217B2 patent drawing
  • US8826217B2 patent drawing
  • US8826217B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and techniques are described for optimizing a circuit design by using a numerical solver. The gates sizes are optimized by modeling a set of gate optimization problems and solving the set of gate optimization problems by using a numerical solver. The optimization can be performed iteratively, wherein in each iteration a gate optimization problem can be modeled for the portion of the circuit design based on circuit information for the portion of the circuit design. An objective function can be created, wherein the objective function includes at least one penalty function that imposes a lower and/or upper bound on at least one variable that is being optimized. In some embodiments, gradients of the objective function, which includes the penalty function, can be computed to enable the use of a conjugate-gradient-based numerical solver.