Gaze Tracking and Dictation for Image Analysis Training Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional training methods for image analysis, such as in radiology, rely heavily on trial and error, making it difficult for instructors to assess a student's proficiency accurately and leading to inefficient learning processes.

Innovation Solution

A system that combines gaze tracking and utterance dictation to identify image artifacts and transcribe spoken descriptions, allowing for real-time analysis of a user's gaze fixation and utterances to determine the accuracy of their understanding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional trial-and-error training methods are used for image analysis, then students can learn through practice, but the learning process becomes inefficient and instructor assessment becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning efficiencyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback by tracking student gaze patterns and comparing them against expert reference patterns. This provides real-time assessment of student proficiency without requiring lengthy trial-and-error training periods, directly improving learning efficiency while reducing training time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical trial-and-error learning process with an automated gaze-tracking-based assessment system. Instead of relying on time-consuming manual evaluation and repeated practice, the system uses eye-tracking technology to objectively measure and assess student understanding, significantly accelerating the learning process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If instructors manually assess student proficiency through observation, then they can provide personalized guidance, but the assessment process becomes time-consuming and imprecise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproficiency assessment accuracyVSAvoidassessment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual instructor observation with automated gaze-tracking technology. The eye tracker objectively measures student focus patterns and compares them against expert reference data, providing precise proficiency assessment without the time constraints of manual evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces gaze-tracking technology as an intermediary between the student and instructor. This intermediary objectively captures and quantifies student attention patterns, providing precise measurement data that eliminates the imprecision and time-consuming nature of direct human observation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive student evaluation is conducted through multiple methods, then assessment accuracy improves, but the complexity of the evaluation system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex multi-method evaluation systems with a streamlined gaze-tracking-based assessment. By substituting multiple evaluation modalities with objective eye-tracking data, the system maintains high assessment accuracy while significantly reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12566495B2Image analysis using gaze tracking and utterance dictation
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 INTUITIVE RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY CORP
  • US12566495B2 patent drawing
  • US12566495B2 patent drawing
  • US12566495B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for evaluating images are disclosed. An image is displayed. Data corresponding to a gaze fixation of a user who is viewing the image is obtained. An image artifact is identified based on the gaze fixation. The image artifact is at a location in the image where the gaze fixation occurred. A recording of the user's utterance is accessed. This recording is recorded during an overlapping time period with when the gaze fixation occurred. The recording is transcribed into text, which is then parsed. A key term is extracted from the parsed text. A determination is made as to whether the key term corresponds to the image artifact identified based on the gaze fixation.