Geometric Mapping of 2D Images to 3D Surfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for registering 2D images with 3D surfaces are inadequate, particularly for large or complex objects, as they often require manual alignment and do not guarantee fidelity over the entire data set, leading to inaccuracies in visualization and measurement.

Innovation Solution

The method involves automatically combining 3D point-cloud data with 2D surface data to achieve geometrically correct registration, allowing for the alignment of multiple images with 3D surfaces, even from varying viewpoints, and reducing visual artifacts through processes like blending and culling of points to maintain data fidelity and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual alignment methods are used for registering 2D images with 3D surfaces, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment process complexityVSAvoidregistration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical alignment processes with an automated computational geometry-based registration system. The system uses mathematical transformations and geometric constraints to automatically align 2D images with 3D surfaces, eliminating the need for manual intervention while achieving superior registration accuracy through algorithmic optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-alignment by automatically detecting corresponding features between 2D images and 3D surfaces and computing the optimal transformation parameters. The geometric constraints and optimization algorithms enable the system to self-register without external manual guidance, achieving both automation and high precision simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automated registration methods are used, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregistration speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the registration process into distinct computational steps: feature detection, correspondence establishment, transformation computation, and validation. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and facilitates automated processing while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adjusts and optimizes transformation parameters (rotation, translation, scaling) through geometric constraints and optimization algorithms. This automated parameter adjustment enables rapid registration without manual manipulation, significantly improving productivity while the computational complexity is managed through efficient mathematical formulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If geometrically correct registration is achieved over complex surfaces, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata fidelityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the registration from simple 2D image alignment to 3D surface mapping by incorporating geometric constraints in multiple dimensions. The system uses 3D geometric relationships and surface topology to achieve accurate registration on complex surfaces, maintaining data fidelity while managing complexity through spatial reasoning and constraint-based optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates geometric constraints as feedback mechanisms that continuously validate and adjust the registration parameters. By comparing the registered 2D image features against the 3D surface geometry and using this feedback to refine the transformation, the system achieves high measurement precision while the computational complexity is managed through iterative optimization with convergence criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9972120B2Systems and methods for geometrically mapping two-dimensional images to three-dimensional surfaces
Publication Date: 2018.05.15 SWEET CHRISTOPHER
  • US9972120B2 patent drawing
  • US9972120B2 patent drawing
  • US9972120B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of mapping a two-dimensional image to a three-dimensional surface includes capturing data for a two-dimensional image and a three-dimensional structure. A process determines coincident points between the 2D image and the 3D structure and maps points on the 2D image to the 3D structure by assigning relative two-coordinate points from the two dimensional image to relative three-coordinate points of the three-dimensional structure. The mapping creates a 3D surface and texturing and removes superfluous data from the created three-dimensional surface to clean the mapped resultant.