Golf Ball Dimple Patterns Using Irregular Polyhedral Tessellation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing golf ball dimple patterns struggle to achieve optimal aerodynamic symmetry and surface coverage, leading to suboptimal performance in terms of aerodynamic efficiency and flight stability, as they are limited by the use of geometric shapes that result in less than optimal surface coverage and disadvantageous dimple arrangements.

Innovation Solution

The method involves generating irregular domains based on polyhedrons, specifically using the midpoint to midpoint method to create and tessellate these domains on the surface of a golf ball, allowing for a uniform dimple pattern that covers the surface with greater than 50% spherical dimples, each with a circular plan shape and specific edge angles, and varying dimple patterns within different domains to achieve improved symmetry and surface coverage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If dimple patterns are based on geometric shapes (circles, hexagons, triangles) or Platonic/Archimedian solids, then aerodynamic symmetry is improved, but surface coverage becomes suboptimal and dimple arrangements are disadvantageous

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic symmetryVSAvoidsurface coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The golf ball surface is segmented into multiple irregular domains, each containing a specific number and arrangement of dimples. These domains are then tessellated across the entire surface, allowing for both local optimization of dimple patterns and global coverage of the surface area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs irregular domains with asymmetric boundaries rather than symmetric geometric shapes. These irregular domains, when tessellated, create a pattern that achieves aerodynamic symmetry at the global level while allowing optimal surface coverage and dimple arrangement at the local level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Loss of energy

If the number of dimples is increased to improve aerodynamic efficiency, then drag reduction is improved, but manufacturing complexity and pattern design difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrag reductionVSAvoidpattern design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single irregular domain design serves as a universal template that can be tessellated across the entire golf ball surface. This universal domain contains an optimized arrangement of dimples for drag reduction, and its repetition ensures consistent aerodynamic performance across all regions without requiring complex unique patterns for each area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates multiple identical copies of a single irregular domain and tessellates them across the golf ball surface. This copying approach simplifies manufacturing by standardizing the dimple pattern while achieving comprehensive surface coverage and optimized aerodynamic characteristics through the repeated pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the aerodynamic efficiency and flight stability of golf balls by providing a high-order symmetrical surface coverage, minimizing the appearance of parting lines, and allowing for greater flexibility in dimple arrangement, resulting in improved aerodynamic characteristics and performance.

Implementation Method 1

Drag is opposite in sense to the direction of flight and orthogonal to lift. The drag force on a ball is attributed to parasitic drag forces, which consist of pressure drag and viscous or skin friction drag.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag: Drag

Implementation Method 2

dimples provide a means to energize the flow field and delay the separation of flow, or reduce the wake region behind the ball

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 3

Lift force is perpendicular to the direction of flight and is a result of air velocity differences above and below the rotating ball. This phenomenon is attributed to Magnus, who described it in 1853 after studying the aerodynamic forces on spinning spheres and cylinders

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnus effect: Magnus Effect

Data Source

PatentUS10213652B2Dimple patterns for golf balls
Publication Date: 2019.02.26 ACUSHNET CO
  • US10213652B2 patent drawing
  • US10213652B2 patent drawing
  • US10213652B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a method for arranging dimples on a golf ball surface in which the dimples are arranged in a pattern derived from at least one irregular domain generated from a regular or non-regular polyhedron. The method includes choosing control points of a polyhedron, generating an irregular domain based on those control points, packing the irregular domain with dimples, and tessellating the irregular domain to cover the surface of the golf ball. The control points include the center of a polyhedral face, a vertex of the polyhedron, a midpoint or other point on an edge of the polyhedron and others. The method ensures that the symmetry of the underlying polyhedron is preserved while minimizing or eliminating great circles due to parting lines.